In article <-vqdnT1cTqRhXtLNnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> "sunray22b" <mike@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
> news:gVL3s.1148$Ax.535@fx18.am4...
> > The 11th Anniversary Of 911 -
> >
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-cra
> > ig-roberts/
> > Doctor Roberts publishes a powerful article from 9/11 researchers. It was
> > an inside job.
>
> Very good link and I liked the following quote:
>
> "The TV news anchors compared the disintegration of the towers to controlled
> demolition. There were numerous reports of explosions throughout the towers
> from the base or sub-basements to the top. (Once the government put out the
> story of terrorist attack, references to controlled demolition and
> explosions disappeared from the print and TV media.) This made sense to me.
> Someone had blown up the buildings. It was completely obvious that the
> towers had not fallen down from asymmetrical structural damage. They had
> blown up."
>
> Yes, that was obvious from day one to me too especially since I saw the
> First Interstate Bank Building in LA keep standing the same day it had a
> huge fire. Link at end of this post.
>
> The only thing I wish is if someone could track down the Naudet Brothers and
> question them about their video and why Flight 11, a flight that some say
> never even took off on 9/11 disappeared a split second right before it was
> supposed to go into WTC1? And then why did the damage that was supposed to
> be caused by the wings of Flight 11 show up a few seconds later? What I'm
> getting at is not only was 9/11 a great big Deception but Flight 11 and
> Flight 77 were also total deceptions. And we know the radar readings could
> be faked from the very games that the military was playing on 9/11/01.
>
============
Surveillance tapes: "Owl Shrine Meetings"
Tape 115
Bohemian Grove, Monte Rio, California
6 April, 2001
11:34 a.m. Local Time
(Translated from the Original Esperanto)
Voice positively identified as ELLSWORTH TOOHEY (Dean, NYU School of
Liberal Arts): Good morning Sergei, glad you could join us.
Voice positively identified as SERGEI LAVROV (Russian Foreign Minister):
Ellsworth! So good to see you! Sorry I'm late, but my flight was
delayed. What have I missed?
TOOHEY: We're discussing the September operation. As you already know,
the main target will be the World Trade Center.
LAVROV: Have our engineers solved the collapse problem?
Voice positively identified as BERNARD SCHWARTZ (Chairman and CEO, Loral
Space & Communications, Inc): The expert consensus is that they will not
collapse merely because of the impact and fires. We've determined that
plastique/thermate will have to be planted on internal structural
supports ahead of time.
Voice positively identified as LI ZHAO XING (PRC Foreign Minister): We
have some people that will take care of that. We'll wire 1 & 2 exactly
two floors below impact.
LAVROV: How can you be sure which floors that will be?
XING: Heh. We know, because we know Bernie's remote pilots will deliver
those planes exactly where they're supposed to.
LAVROV: Even on the first pass?
SCHWARTZ: Yes, on the first pass. There will be no mistakes.
XING: And we'll also wire Tower 7 to collapse, either in tandem or
several hours later.
LAVROV: How come?
TOOHEY: Well, it's possible that
John O'Neill won't be in 1 or 2 at the
time of impact. If he's in his offices in Tower 7, we'll take it down
then. We can't allow him to survive the attacks.
LAVROV: What if we catch him in 1 or 2?
TOOHEY: Well, we aren't animals. We'll allow 7 to be evacuated
completely before we blow it--say by 5 that evening.
Voice positively identified as DAVID ANGELL (Director/Producer "Cheers"
and "Frasier"): Yes, and I keep trying to tell these knuckleheads that
that will arouse suspicion. They make me nervous with all their
"assurances." I still think all the towers should all go down at the
same time!
TOOHEY: David's objections noted.
LAVROV: What have we decided about the fictional passengers, crew, and
the pantomime for NORAD and FAA Ground Control?
Voice positively identified as RUPERT MURDOCK (Chairman of News
Corporation): That's all been taken care of. We have about 600
operatives set up around the country who will testify that they had
relatives and/or co-workers aboard the planes. CIA has created false
identity records and social security numbers for the fictional
passengers. NORAD and Ground control will be no problem, though we have
to make sure that the F-16's aren't scrambled in time to stop the
collisions.
In case some of the operatives later change their minds about
cooperating, I think I have the solution: My stations and channels will
have the goal of raising about $ 1.5 million per "victim's" family. Once
they get their money, they won't open their mouths--I guarantee it.
LAVROV: Well, it sounds like we're all set.
Voice positively identified as LOU GERSTNER (Chairman of Carlyle Group):
Not really. We all seem to agree that we don't quite have a war yet.
LAVROV: No?
Voice positively identified as TED KOOSER (US Poet Laureate): No.
Definitely not. We need to hit a military target as well.
SCHWARTZ: Well don't look at me--I've committed all of the remote pilots
and remote equipment I have. If I brought in more operatives, I couldn't
verify that they could be trusted.
KOOSER: We realize that, Bernie. Which is why I'm suggesting we use a
cruise missile to attack the Pentagon.
Voice positively identified as DICK CHENEY (Former SecDef and current
Vice President): And your suggestion for a Tomahawk won't work, as I've
already explained. Tomahawks aren't designed to penetrate
structures--they detonate over their target and use the shock wave to
destroy structures and personnel.
TOOEY: Then what do you suggest, Dick?
CHENEY: A Harpoon anti-ship missile. We can launch it from one of our
subs secretly stationed in the Potomac.
ANGELL: But it has to fit with
Operation Bojinka!!? What's the fucking
cover story for a fucking Harpoon hitting the Pentagon?
GERSTNER: We'll pretend it was another hijacked airliner.
CHENEY: Yes, we've painted "American Airlines" on the side of the
Harpoon we intend to launch.
ANGELL: Holy Fuck. Like that's gonna work.
GERSTNER: Look, David, there's gonna be a lot of confusion that day.
We'll get the 300 operatives to claim they had relatives and co-workers
on the plane.
ANGELL: That's 900 fucking operatives we have to trust--so far! What
time are the attacks supposed to take place?
TOOHEY: Tentatively set for about 9 am. Someday in the middle of
September.
ANGELL: At RUSH HOUR? Aren't the fucking offices of USA Today right
across the fucking street from the Pentagon? What if someone sees that
it's a fucking Harpoon missile and not a fucking airliner?
TOOHEY: Donna, would you take David out on the lake and try to calm him
down? We're breaking for lunch anyway."
Voice positively identified as DONNA BRAZILE : Come on, David, let's get
the row boat down to the dock.
Voice positively identified as HASNI MUBARAK: Yes, come on, David, I'll
help.
ANGELL: Oh, alright. But I'm still not convinced this crazy operation
will work.
[sound of foot steps and shuffling--then two minutes of silence on the
tape]
TOOHEY: We'll have to "take care" of David.
Voice positively identified as PRINCE SAUD AL FAISAL: Not to worry, my
people will take care of him. He'll disappear, and maybe we can even
pretend he was on one of the WTC planes.
TOOHEY: Very good, my friend. Let's go have some lunch. Tomorrow we'll
discuss the Capitol/White House phase of the September plan.
[footsteps followed by silence, meeting doesn't reconvene until the next
day: see Tape 116]
==============
--
Neolibertarian
"Global Warming: It ain't the heat, it's the stupidity."