From http://www.halturnershow.com/index.html - Published December 4, 2006 1:42 PM EST
Members of the Congress and Senate will NOT be permitted to BETRAY our
nation by simply GIVING AWAY the most cherished aspect of America,
Citizenship, to millions of people who cared so little for what Citizenship
means that they came here against our law.
Congress will not be permitted to BETRAY our nation by giving Citizenship
to tens of thousands who didn't give a shit about our other laws as they
murdered, raped, robbed, dealt illegal drugs, drove without licenses or
insurance, stole the social security numbers and/or identities of millions of
lawful citizens and most of whom don't give a shit enough about our country to
even learn our language!
Any Congress that grants Citizenship en masse to such people will have
BETRAYED OUR NATION. As one of our Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton,
wrote in Federalist 28: If the representatives of the people betray their
constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that
original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of
government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be
exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the
rulers of an individual State. In a single State, if the persons entrusted with
supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts
of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular
measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without
concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.
It is our right as Americans to act in self-defense of our nation.
Members of The United States House of Representatives or United States Senate
who try to grant any form of Amnesty to millions of illegal aliens are hereby
notified they may as well paint a bulls-eye target on themselves. Our Bullets
don't care about their sovereign power.
This seems to be "it" folks. I'm going to do what I have to do to protect my
nation from its government. I know where all of my New Jersey Congressmen and
Senators live. Do you know where yours live? If not, you better find out before
January so you can scope out their neighborhoods and prepare yourselves.
Those of you who, for years, have said you're "gonna do this" or "gonna do that"
when the time comes; are about to face ugly reality. In January, "the time"
will come. In January the entire world will find out if you're real or just a
bigmouth coward.
The pro-white movement has a habit of making martyrs of folks who take action.
They hold rallies for them. They put up web sites about them.
Just so we're clear, the only people authorized to do that for me after I become
a martyr (alive or dead) are those who stand with me when the fight takes place.
Because if you are, TODAY, "pro-white" and you fail to stand with me in
confronting our renegade government, then I say you are a coward and I don't
want my name being uttered by cowards.
This alleged "Amnesty" will mark the actual end of our nation. By its enactment,
it will say to the world, anyone can come to America, at any time, legally or
not, and we won't do anything about it. That will erase us as a nation and I
will not permit it. What about you?
Comments so far on this story (86)
From Congress open to passing bill on immigration
By
By Charles Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
December 4, 2006
Congress will approve an immigration bill that will grant citizenship
rights to most of the 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the U.S.
after Democrats take control next month, predict both sides on Capitol Hill.
While Republicans have been largely splintered on the issue of
immigration reform, Democrats have been fairly unified behind the principle
that the illegals currently in the country should get citizenship rights
without having to first leave the country.
"Years of dawdling have worsened our border security and made it harder
to fix this broken system," said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Democrat
who will lead the Judiciary Committee next year. "We should not let partisan
politics and intolerance continue to delay and derail effective reform."
Democrats in both chambers say they will start with some form of
legislation first drafted by Sens. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and
Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, which was the basis for the bill
that was approved earlier this year by the Senate.
"This past May, the Senate Judiciary Committee reported and then the
Senate passed bipartisan versions of comprehensive immigration reform to
bring people out of the shadows while strengthening our borders," Mr. Leahy
said. "I look forward to building on that work next year and making progress
on a bipartisan effort that improves security, supports our economy and
respects the dignity of all people."
House Republicans and many outside Congress derided that bill as
"amnesty" for allowing illegals to remain in the U.S. and eventually become
citizens. Democrats say it's not amnesty because aliens must pay a fine and
wait years before becoming citizens.
"The Senate bill is pure amnesty," said Rep. Jack Kingston, Georgia
Republican. "Dress it up any way you want, it's still amnesty. It lets
people pay their way out of sneaking into the country illegally."
With President Bush as an ally in the White House, he worries, Democrats
will proceed next year with legislation to ultimately make citizens out of
most of the illegals now in the country. And Republicans, still reeling from
deep losses in the November elections, will give up the fight.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, said he expects an
immigration-reform bill that doesn't deport illegal aliens to be the only
significant legislation to come out of the new Democratic Congress and win
Mr. Bush's approval.
"The only real legislation that can be expected from Congress is
amnesty," he said. "If they come up with a plan and the president is behind
it, it will pick up a lot of our own members."
Republicans also expressed little confidence that their leadership team
is committed to blocking amnesty.
The group Americans for Better Immigration, which supports tougher
immigration policies, has given Republican leaders mixed grades on the
issue. But on the issue of amnesty, the grades have been much worse.
By Charles Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
December 4, 2006
Rep. John A. Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader, has a "D";
Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri, the House Republican whip, scores a "C+." Incoming
House Republican Conference Chairman Adam H. Putnam of Florida, who has
co-sponsored legislation that many view as amnesty, scores an "F-" from the
group on the issue.
Still, Mr. Boehner and Mr. Blunt can claim credit for thwarting the Senate
immigration bill earlier this year. But now the only hope, Republicans say, is
that some of the conservative Democrats who beat Republican incumbents this
year will side with conservatives in the House to block anything that smells
like amnesty.
Rep. Tom Tancredo, the Colorado Republican and a leading critic of
amnesty, was initially dejected by November's elections, fearing that
Democrats would ram through immigration reform. But a recent congressional
trip with conservative-leaning "Blue Dog" Democrats changed his mind.
They don't want to touch the issue, he said, after seeing fissures already
develop among Democrats' base voters on the issue. Illegal-alien advocacy
groups think the Senate bill is too harsh on illegal aliens because it imposes
fines on all and excludes others with criminal records. Those groups also
insist future workers have a direct path to citizenship -- a requirement that
labor unions fiercely oppose.
"I think it's going to be much more difficult for them to do than I had
thought the day after the election," Mr. Tancredo said.
Most likely, he said, Democrats will succeed at undoing plans to build 700
miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"The thing that's in the greatest jeopardy right now is the fence, because
they do have the appropriations process and that's probably the one they can
stop," Mr. Tancredo said.
• Stephen Dinan contributed to this report.