Einstein

Albert Einstein has been very heavily promoted as the greatest genius ever. This is an interesting fact which deserves a closer look. An overwhelming majority of us do not understand the physics that he told us about. This makes it easier to get away with telling lies about his work. Like a lot of things we are told, there is a political agenda behind it. Einstein was a communist Jew. Jews are very influential in the media. These points add up to the idea that fraud is possible. If a number of people out there tell us that all of his papers could have been based on earlier work by better men, we can think that they might be right.

Fraud to promote a Jew who would promote Zionism gives us a motivation. It is a matter of fact that Sigmund Freud was also a Jew from Germany operating in Europe about the same time. He has been written off as 90% charlatan by people qualified to judge.

We might think there is no smoke without fire. Some of his critics have at least some idea of what they are talking about. The fact that there are so many proves that questions have been asked and that not everyone is satisfied with his honesty.

The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein by Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Mr Bjerknes is not a fan. This can happen if you look past the evidence and find the hype.

 

#Albert Einstein Genius or Plagiarist
Was written by someone who has been over the ground. It sounds plausible and there are no obvious errors in it.

 

Einstein - Plagiarist of the Century
QUOTE
"ALBERT EINSTEIN. Plagiarist of the Century. Einstein plagiarized the work of several notable scientists in his 1905 papers on special relativity and E = mc2 ..."
www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/einstein.html
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein -- was he a thief, a liar and a plagiarist?
QUOTE
"was he a thief, a liar and a plagiarist? ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. ..."
www.biblebelievers.org.au/einstein.htm
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist
QUOTE
"Some of the correspondence between Mileva Maric and Albert Einstein is reproduced ..... "News: Einstein -- Genius or Plagiarist?" EnergyGrid Magazine (USA) ..."
home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/mileva.htm
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist
QUOTE
"It is easily proven that Albert Einstein did not originate the special theory of ... "News: Einstein -- Genius or Plagiarist?" EnergyGrid Magazine (USA) ..."
home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/prioritymyth.htm
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist: Books ...
QUOTE
"Amazon.com: Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist: Books: ..That Einstein was not the original genius that his adulators have made him out to be ..."
www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-Incorrigible-Christopher-Bjerknes/dp/0971962987
UNQUOTE

 

Reviews for Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible  
QUOTE
"Amazon.com: Reviews for Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist: Books: ... That Einstein was not the original genius that his adulators have made him ..."
www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-Incorrigible-Christopher-Bjerknes/dp/customer-reviews/0971962987
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein: Prophet or Plagiarist
QUOTE
"A site that publicizes controversial physics issues."
einstein52.tripod.com/alberteinsteinprophetorplagiarist/
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein, Communist And Security Risk
QUOTE
In 1939 research done by several leading scientists including Enrico Fermi regarding chain reactions of nuclear fission prompted Leo Szilard to persuade Einstein to write a letter to President, to warn the President about the possibility of nuclear weapons and that Nazi Germany had already taken an interest in this technology.

Einstein himself had never been involved in the Manhattan project. He was considered a security risk, as he was a member, sponsor, or affiliated with thirty-four communist fronts between 1937 and 1954. Later he condemned the use of nuclear weapons.
UNQUOTE
Did the BBC tell you that? There is a lot the Beeb don't tell us. The Beeb is also a security risk.

 

Anti-Einstein sentiment surfaces again - Physics World ...
QUOTE
"Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist Christopher Jon Bjerknes .... He refers to Einstein as "a genius" and points out that "[t]here still remains ..."
physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/17201
UNQUOTE

 

EnergyGrid >> Science & Technology
QUOTE
"Now we may know where his "genius" came from. (For more information, read Christopher J. Bjerknes's book, Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist or ..."
www.energygrid.com/science.html
UNQUOTE

 

Google Directory - Science > Physics > History > People > Einstein ...
QUOTE
"Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist" a book by Christopher Bjerknes. ... Was Albert Einstein, in fact, a plagiarist, who copied the theories of ..."
www.google.com/Top/Science/Physics/History/People/Einstein,_Albert/
UNQUOTE

 

Was Albert Einstein a hoax?
QUOTE
"It was during the period that Albert Einstein worked in the patent office ... Albert Einstein: Genius or Plagiarist · FBI Investigation of Albert Einstein ..."
www.samsloan.com/einstein.htm
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein A Plagiarist?
QUOTE
"Albert Einstein A Plagiarist? By Rory Carroll in Rome The Guardian - UK 8-29-03 ..... Is it plausible to believe that Einstein, a supposed genius and master ..."
www.rense.com/general40/einstein.htm
QUOTE

 

news from Daryl Bradford Smith
QUOTE
"Einstein: Super Genius? Or Super Plagiarist? 24 Feb 2006 ... Albert Einstein is held up as the most intelligent human to ever walk the earth. ..."
iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Einstein.html
UNQUOTE

 

Altermedia news U.S.A. » Albert Einstein: Plagiarist and Fraud
QUOTE
"Albert Einstein is today revered as “the Father of Modern Science”. His wrinkled face and wild hair has become a symbol for scientific genius and “his” ..."
us.altermedia.info/news-of-interest-to-white-people/albert-einstein-plagiarist-and-fraud_1295.html
UNQUOTE

 

canberra.yourguide.com.au
QUOTE
"THE name "Einstein" evokes images of a good-humoured genius, .... Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist (ISBN 0971962987) is available at ..."
canberra.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?class=features&subclass=science&category=feature&story_id=179892&y=2002&m=9
UNQUOTE

 

Review of Albert Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist
QUOTE
"Review of Albert Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist. (Thomas E. Phipps, Jr.) (From Infinite Energy Magazine, N. 47, 6 October, 2002) ..."
itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep6/ep6-phipps.htm
UNQUOTE

 

Albert Einstein: Plagiarist of the ce... - Einstein - tribe.net
QUOTE
"Albert Einstein: Plagiarist of the century? topic posted Mon, July 11, 2005 - 10:43 PM by ... I agree) what makes him the genius is that he published. ..."
mc2.tribe.net/thread/56862836-10bb-4efd-904d-5f64afd9cc50
UNQUOTE

 

Relativity Plagiarism Dispute ex Wiki
QUOTE
Claims have been put forward about both theories that they have been formulated by others before Einstein, and that these people should get the credit. Consequently, Albert Einstein would deserve less credit for these theories, and according to some, even no credit at all for special relativity. At issue is whether Einstein can be considered the true creator of these theories, based on priority issues. The general history of the development of these theories, including the contributions made by many other scientists, is found at History of special relativity and History of general relativity.
UNQUOTE
The Wiki has a go at the issue of Bert's stealing other men's work but 'an Editor' is unhappy. Who is this editor? Could he be another Jew with an agenda? Who knows? Jimmy Wales perhaps. He is also a Jew. Archived in /data/Einstein

 

Revelations
QUOTE
"Albert Einstein the Incorrigible Plagiarist suggests that Einstein had a tendency to ... "News: Einstein -- Genius or Plagiarist?" EnergyGrid Magazine (USA) ..."
just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/einstein-incorrigible-plagiarist.html
UNQUOTE

 

TWW - Albert Einstein: A moron and plagiarist
QUOTE
UNQUOTE
"Einstein was not this "genius of geniuses", and the j00z are NOT this master ... Message Boards » The Soap Box » Albert Einstein: A moron and plagiarist ..."
www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=417661&page=3
UNQUOTE

 

FarShores Article - ALBERT EINSTEIN: Plagiarist of the Century
QUOTE
"FarShores Article - ALBERT EINSTEIN: Plagiarist of the Century."
farshores.org/rm04ein.htm
UNQUOTE

 

Einstein Was A Racist Jew And A Fraud  [ 29 January 2019 ]
QUOTE
Albert Einstein—who once said that racism “was a white man’s disease”—has been exposed a virulent racist with the publication of his diaries in which he says that Indians “live in great filth and considerable stench,” and calls Chinese people “filthy and obtuse,” and says it would “unbearably dreary . . . pity if these Chinese supplant all other races.”

Einstein—the physicist promoted by the controlled media as a “genius” but who has been accused of stealing much of his work from other scientists—is also famous for making a May 1946 speech at Pennsylvania’s Lincoln University in which he said “there is a separation of colored people from white people in the United States. That separation is not a disease of colored people. It is a disease of white people. I do not intend to be quiet about it.” (Albert Einstein, “Civil Rights activist,” The Harvard Gazette, April 12, 2007).  Now however, it is clear that Einstein was just another racist Jewish hypocrite, more concerned with attacking white people than anything else.

Extracts from his newly-translated The Travel Diaries of Albert Einstein (Edited by Ze’ev Rosenkranz, Princeton University Press) reveal that he was a virulent racist in private who clearly despised nonwhites...............

Einstein’s quote about racism being a “white man’s disease” is thus revealed as yet another Jewish communist hoax. Einstein was closely linked to the Soviet Union’s “Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee” (JAC), founded in 1942 on Joseph Stalin’s order...................

Einstein’s claim to have been the first to discover the Theory of General Relativity has long been questioned.  The debate was finally settled in November 2015, when Princeton University published an article by Daniel Kennefick, co-author of An Einstein Encyclopedia, titled “Was Einstein the First to Discover General Relativity?”

That article admitted that the basic principles of the theory of General Relativity were contained in a paper prepared by the German mathematician David Hilbert, and given to Einstein on November 20 1915.  Einstein published his paper on the theory of General Relativity on November 25, 1915—five days after Hilbert had given him a preview of his paper.
UNQUOTE
Bert Einstein is heavily marketed as the ultimate genius because he was a Marxist Jew. Other, far cleverer Jews like John von Neumann get much less notice. Surprisingly, the Guardian admits his guilt.

 

 

Albert Einstein Genius or Plagiarist
I think Birdman might have overstated his case a bit but on the basic point he is very much on the right lines. It is definitely true that real geniuses like John von Neumann got scant recognition even though they were Jews. Einstein was a communist as well as a Jew, whence the marketing drive from the Jews in the Main Stream Media.

From http://www.thebirdman.org

Albert Einstein

Genius or Plagiarist
ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The Often-Repeated Lie= Truth,' he has been made an  idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius. THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept &   moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary -- he stole the ideas of others, and the Jxxxx-controlled media  made him a 'hero.'

 When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN.  Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story.  The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that  he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15,   "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack  of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.

 This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!

 Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking  papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.

 He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.

 Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of  university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.

 Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat,  including   Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that  many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because  indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept  moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any  real education.

 HOWEVER, THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.

 Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of  which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:

 1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;

 2) The equivalence of energy and mass;

 3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;

 4) The special theory of relativity.

 Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of  relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to  Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called  the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in  1915).

 This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was  based upon two premises:

1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of  nature are the same for all observers; and

2) since the speed of light is  independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between  two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of   reference the events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's  velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.  This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis  for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally  Einstein's. FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT  AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT   ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST James Maxwell  in 1878.

 Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature.

 James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition  of   the Encyclopædia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by  1887,   as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific  community,   particularly Lorentz, Michelson [ Jew ] and Morley reached the conclusion that  the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the observer.

 Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years   before Einstein wrote his paper.  This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley  to conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.

 In response to this problem, in 1880, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the Michelson Morley experiment could be explained if, "...the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the either or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."

 THIS IS THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, 13 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN'S PAPER!

 FURTHER... IN 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, of the Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction.

 In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, "Lorentz transformations," the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They> describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in "Einstein's paper" regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published. The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper: "...we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible." Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.

 Thus, we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term   'Special Theory of Relativity.' EVERYTHING ELSE WAS PLAGIARIZED. Over the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent> office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.

 This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.

The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.

 That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J. J. Thomson and by Walter Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenöhrl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.

 Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2 was the logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.

THUS, THE EXPERIMENTS OF THOMSON, KAUFMANN, AND FINALLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, HASENÖRHL, CONFIRMED MAXWELL'S WORK. IT IS LUDICROUS TO BELIEVE THAT EINSTEIN DEVELOPED THIS POSTULATE, particularly in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments. In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic scientific principles and that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible experience." The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is particularly important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he UNJUSTLY received his 1922 Nobel Prize.

 But AGAIN IT IS NOT EINSTEIN, BUT WILHELM WIEN AND MAX PLANCK WHO DESERVE THE CREDIT. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.

Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough. Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of energy light energy. But the principles and equations governing the process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.

After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it was arranged by World Jewry for him to take a position at a school . Still, it was not until a 1919 A Jewish newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety. With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly.

He engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at least take partial credit. In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915.

 BUT THE MATHEMATICAL WORK WAS NOT DONE BY EINSTEIN - HE WAS INCAPABLE OF IT.   Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel Grossmann [ Jew ], who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Bernhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.

The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect.

 It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he, "completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.

 Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking.

 However, the exact opposite is true. EINSTEIN STOLE THE MAJORITY OF HIS GENERAL RELATIVITY WORK FROM THESE TWO MEN, THE REST BEING TAKEN FROM GROSSMANN. HILBERT SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION, A WEEK BEFORE EINSTEIN COMPLETED HIS WORK, A PAPER WHICH CONTAINED THE CORRECT FIELD EQUATIONS, OF GENERAL RELATIVITY.

 What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a lecture.

Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.

  Therefore, THIS SERVES AS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT EINSTEIN QUICKLY PLAGIARIZED THE WORK AND THEN PRESENTED IT, HOPING TO BEAT HILBERT TO THE PUNCH. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first. Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics. That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory of relativity." However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.

 As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jxxxx-controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert. On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, EINSTEIN RECEIVED THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR THE WORK HE HAD STOLEN IN 1905 REGARDING THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT.

 The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to be today.

 As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues.

 This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved. The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could. The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.

 The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry.

NO, THE JEWS DID NOT WANT HEISENBERG PROMOTED AS A GENIUS BECAUSE HE WOULD GO ON TO HEAD THE GERMAN ATOMIC BOMB PROJECT AND SERVE PRISON TIME AFTER THE WAR FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE THIRD REICH. No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says, "But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy to drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance then, according to Einstein, you are wrong"

 Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.

 

 

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me atMike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page

Updated on Saturday, 16 February 2019 11:03:40