New Labour was new, exciting different, an improvement on the boring image of cloth caps, whippets and bitter, which was Old Labour. It came into being inter alia because John Smith died just in time for Blair to take over. Cui bono? This is Latin for who benefits. Mr Smith seems to have been a decent man but an Old Labour leader.
New Labour was essentially a four man
operation. The perpetrators were:-
Blair, an aspiring
Capitalist Swine who is now rich due to the pay offs/post dated
bribes/honestly earned remuneration [ delete to taste ]
Brown, a grossly spendthrift Scot put into Parliament by
communists
Alastair Campbell, newspaper editor, drunkard & pornographer
&
Peter Mandelson, a homosexual Jew
People have asked why John Smith died so quickly and conveniently. One such is at Did New World Order Fabians murder John Smith MP? Politics qualify as a high stakes game with power as the prize. Controlling a budget more than £500 billion is only part of it. Someone drops out of the running suddenly. Just one of those things? Life's like that. Setting up an operation means doing it once, doing it right. They got away with the 9/11 Job so why not an inconvenient man like Mr Smith. Then Hugh Gaitskell dropped out of the running to be succeeded Harold Wilson. Coincidence? Maybe. Bad news certainly. Hugh was Labour's Best Leader albeit the writer does not agree.
We know that Blair & Brown are Fabians that is to say Marxist manipulators using a different name, a flag of convenience. Destroying England is the objective. Look at the damage that the Bolsheviks did in Russia to realise how bad it could be.
Hugh Gaitskell ex Wiki
Hugh Todd Naylor Gaitskell, CBE, PC, MP (9 April 1906 – 18 January 1963) was a British Labour politician who held Cabinet office in Clement Attlee's governments, and was the Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition from 1955 until his death in 1963. He was responsible for introducing prescription charges in the National Health Service, which caused Aneurin Bevan to resign from the Cabinet in 1951.Death
He died in January 1963, aged 56, after a sudden flare of lupus erythematosus, an autoimmune disease.[18][6] His death left an opening for Harold Wilson in the party leadership; Wilson narrowly won the next general election for Labour 21 months later.The abrupt and unexpected nature of his death led to some speculation that foul play might have been involved. The most popular conspiracy theory involved a supposed KGB plot to ensure that Wilson (alleged by the supporters of these theories to be a KGB agent himself) became prime minister. This claim was given new life by Peter Wright's controversial 1987 book Spycatcher, but the only evidence that ever came to light was the testimony of a Soviet defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn. Golitsyn was a controversial figure who also claimed, for example, that the Sino-Soviet split was a deception intended to deceive the West. His claims about Wilson were repeatedly investigated and never substantiated.
Gaitskell is buried in the churchyard of St John-at-Hampstead Church, north London. His wife was buried alongside him following her own death in 1989.[19]
New Labour ex Wiki
New Labour refers to a period in the history of the British Labour Party from the mid-1990s to the late 2000s, under leaders Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. The name dates from a conference slogan first used by the party in 1994 which was later seen in a draft manifesto published in 1996, called New Labour, New Life For Britain. It was presented as the brand of a newly reformed party that had altered Clause IV and endorsed market economics. The branding was extensively used while the party was in government, between 1997 and 2010. New Labour won landslide election victories in 1997 and 2001, and won again in 2005. In 2007, Blair resigned as the party's leader and was succeeded by Gordon Brown. Labour lost the 2010 general election, which resulted in a hung parliament and led to the creation of a Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition government; Gordon Brown resigned as Prime Minister, and as Labour leader shortly thereafter. He was succeeded by Ed Miliband after that year's leadership election.The "New Labour" brand was developed to regain trust from the electorate and to portray a departure from "Old Labour", which was criticised for its breaking of election promises and its links between trade unions and the state. The "New Labour" brand was used to communicate the party's modernisation to the public. It was coordinated by Alastair Campbell, who centralised the party's communications and used his experience in journalism to achieve positive media relations. In 2002, following criticism from Philip Gould, Blair announced the need to reinvent the brand based on a unified domestic policy and greater assertion in foreign affairs. Following the leadership of Neil Kinnock and John Smith, the party under the New Labour brand attempted to widen its electoral appeal and, by the 1997 general election, had made significant gains in the upper and middle classes. Labour maintained this wider support in the 2001 and 2005 elections. The brand was retired in 2010.
New Labour has been influenced by the political thinking of Anthony Crosland, the leadership of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell's media campaigning. The political philosophy of New Labour was influenced by the party's development of Anthony Giddens' "Third Way", which attempted to provide a synthesis between capitalism and socialism. The party emphasised the importance of social justice, rather than equality, emphasising the need for equality of opportunity, and believed in the use of free markets to deliver economic efficiency and social justice. In 2002, Giddens named spin as New Labour's biggest failure, but commended the party's success in certain policy areas and at marginalising the Conservative Party.
Old Labour ex Wiki
The Labour Party is a centre-left political party in the United Kingdom.[4][5][6][7] Growing out of the trade union movement and socialist parties of the nineteenth century, the Labour Party has been described as a "broad church", encompassing a diversity of ideological trends from strongly socialist to moderate social democratic.Founded in 1900, the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party as the main opposition to the Conservative Party in the early 1920s, forming minority governments under Ramsay MacDonald in 1924 and from 1929 to 1931. Labour later served in the wartime coalition from 1940 to 1945, after which it formed a majority government under Clement Attlee. Labour was also in government from 1964 to 1970 under Harold Wilson and from 1974 to 1979, first under Wilson and then James Callaghan.
The Labour Party was last in government from 1997 to 2010 under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, beginning with a landslide majority of 179, reduced to 167 in 2001 and 66 in 2005. Having won 232 seats in the 2015 general election, the party is the Official Opposition in the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Labour runs a minority government in the Welsh Assembly under Carwyn Jones, is the largest opposition party in the Scottish Parliament and has twenty MEPs in the European Parliament, sitting in the Socialists and Democrats Group. The Labour Party is a full member of the Party of European Socialists and Progressive Alliance, and holds observer status in the Socialist International. In September 2015, Jeremy Corbyn was elected Leader of the Labour Party.
Did New World Order Fabians murder John Smith MP?
John Smith QC MP was a Scottish politician who served as leader of the Labour Party from 1992 until his sudden and unexpected death from a heart attack in 1994.
As with all unexpected deaths of prominent politicians such as that of Robin Cook, there was some speculation at the time that his death was suspicious but there was no apparent specific motive.
However, events since the coming to power of New Labour in 1997 present a much clearer reason why John Smith might have been murdered. John Smith's death was certainly convenient for some people. Suspiciously convenient.
Cui bono?
Lucius Cassius Longinus Ravilla, whom the Romans regarded as a very honest and wise judge, was in the habit of asking, time and again, "To whose benefit?"
John Smith was a traditional Old Labourite. If he had lived and gone on to win the 1997 General Election, there would not have been New Labour in its present form. One of the main differences between Old Labour and New Labour is that New Labour is Fabian.
John Smith was not a Fabian. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are Fabians.
The ultimate objective of the Fabians is to create a One World Communitarian ('Third Way') government. This ties in with the New World Order project. John Smith was not a One World Communitarian and would have been distrusted by the NWO/Bilderberg brigade who wanted someone at the head of the UK government whom they could manipulate.
Strange things have been happening in Britain in recent years. For example, the police have lost their common sense. This is because Fabian New Labour has a hidden agenda.
The management mechanism being used to carry out the true and hidden agenda of Fabian New Labour is a fraudulent 'educational charity' called Common Purpose. You can find out more about Common Purpose here: www.stopcp.com and here: www.cpexposed.com
Remember, the NWO/Bilderberg group are playing for extremely high stakes and have no qualms about getting rid of people who stand in their way. Fabian New Labour are, after all, quite willing to join wars started on the basis of lies.
There are literally no depths to which this institutionally-corrupt Fabian New Labour government will not descend: multi-billion Eurofraud, relentless and ruthless abuses of citizens, lying, cheating, secrecy, going to war on the basis of lies, oppressive social control, abrogating sovereign rule to Brussels, corruption, deceit, fraud, treachery, bankrupting the country and so on.
-------------------------------------------------
So the motive for murder - get rid of John Smith in favour of a Fabian (Tony Blair) who would have been happy to go along with the Fabian/Bilderberg/NWO One World Communitarian Government project.
-------------------------------------------------
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear."
Marcus Tullius Cicero - (106-43 BC) Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator
Labour's Best Leader?
Who are Labour’s most successful leaders? The question is purely subjective, wrought with personal prejudices and riddled with rhetoric. There is, truly, no one right answer. It depends ultimately, as Luke Akehurst rightly observes, on which measure you lay weight to. Luke chose electoral success, which is naturally the benchmark for any leader. On this, the Labour party has some true greats. The obvious candidate is one Tony Blair who took the party of serial opposition to a thrice-winning electoral movement that consigned the Conservatives to their longest period of opposition since the Corn Law reforms in the 1840s. Harold Wilson of course won four out of the five general elections he contested, though his fortunes swung between a crushing 96 majority to majority of just three. Nobody, rightly, tries to make a case for James Callaghan, Michael Foot or Neil Kinnock as candidates for the pantheon and some of the devotion to the late John Smith derives, no doubt, from a desperate endeavour to find a leader of note that wasn’t Blair. But what of an oft-forgotten Labour leader whose sole general election campaign consigned Labour to a third straight defeat, and a 100-seat Conservative majority?In Nick Thomas-Symonds’ authoritative account from Labour’s pioneers right up until Gordon Brown’s doomed three years he, perhaps unsurprisingly for an author of his life, chose Clement Attlee as Labour’s most successful leader. Many do, and for many reasons. He swept to power in 1945, the first majoritarian Labour government. In the immediate aftermath of this crushing victory, Labour might have established a new electoral dominance in British politics, but within five years the chance had been duly squandered. By 1948, the government had lost its capacity for creative thinking having implemented its manifesto. Attlee’s failure to reignite his governing élan intellectually bankrupted the party for a decade to come and dogged the party with the ‘what next?’ question. But there was someone who slipped in almost unnoticed in the 1945 landslide as the member for Leeds South. By 1950 he was chancellor, and by 1955 party leader. His surname would coin the phrase synonymous with the postwar consensus and he in many respects laid the foundations for a Labour recovery at the end of the 20th century.
Hugh Gaitskell attempted to redefine the party’s socialist goals in detail that no other Labour leader would until Blair’s election to the leadership in 1994. At the forefront of his leadership was his revisionist zeal: a desire to haul the party of persistent small ‘c’ conservatism to reformulate socialist principles and adopt a new programme that was relevant to the rapidly and radically changing social and economic circumstances.
The traditional association with socialism and the public ownership of the means of production, embodied in the original Clause IV of the party constitution, was both obsolete and inadequate even in Gaitskell’s time. His battle over Clause IV represented the culmination of the revisionist attempt not just to demote the role of public ownership in Labour party policy and ideology – but also to demythologise it as the dominant idea. The original Clause IV text was written in 1892. Only the Labour party would deify a text so old and on which successive party leaders had no intention of implementing.
It is tempting to view Gaitskell as just another 20th century Labour leader who joined the substantial number who never became prime minister. Throughout the last century, seven Labour leaders in all never reached the highest office. He could thus become a partial footnote in political history, rather than a chapter. But in spite of Gaitskell’s weak electoral record he had the determination to prevent the Labour party, after its third successive defeat, from retiring resentfully into electoral insignificance, and the resilience, against appalling short term Bevanite pressure, from caving in and retreating from a substantial examination of the contentious issue of public ownership.
His revisionism was a commitment to the future of the Labour party as an independent entity. He advocated, in his attempt to remove Clause IV, the modernisation of the Labour party. His legacy, and thereby success, is of an alternative model to the one’s examined by Akehurst and Symonds. But he was the original Labour moderniser and, like many visionaries, was decades ahead of his time.
David Talbot is a political consultant, tweets @_davetalbot and writes the weekly The Week Ahead column on Progress
Blair and Brown invented a monster to frighten the voters: Old Labour. Now it’s fighting back
Read if you want, believe if you want.