22 March 2011
Judges Abusing Power Order People Not To Speak To MPs
QUOTE
Mr Peter Bone (in the Chair): This very important debate is about articles 9 and 13 of the Bill of Rights and the role of Parliament in dealing with all grievances and the importance of freedom of communication between constituents and Members,.........On that point, and particularly in connection with family law, it is the bullying of constituents that is one of the most offensive aspects of this. In trying to explain to parliamentary colleagues why we sought to hold this debate and what is so important about it, the example that I have given that has most grabbed their attention is that of a social services department saying to a constituent, "If you talk to your Member of Parliament, we'll make sure you lose custody of your child." Does that not illustrate vividly the nature of the problem that we are dealing with?..........
I am not the only one having problems. When I talk to colleagues of all parties, they all find similar problems with the aggressive way in which apparatchiks of the state attempt to ban constituents from talking to MPs. We have judges creating situations where it is made an imprisonable offence to tell an MP that a case exists. I do not think that is right, transparent or accountable.
UNQUOTE
It may be that various judges are in Contempt of Parliament, the crime of obstructing Parliament in the carrying out of its functions, or of hindering any Member of Parliament in the performance of his or her duties. It is somewhat similar to similar to Contempt of court. A court order to keep a case secret needs honest justification. Concealing official corruption or malice is not justice.
PS The issue was brought out by John Hemming, an honest MP apart from a bit of fornication - whoops, make that a lot of nookie. Then there were the expenses. Errare human est but he does the right things for his constituents.
PPS This article is rather long the real point is clear enough.
Hyper Injunctions And Secret Prisoners
QUOTE
Mr John Hemming, MP for Yardley in Birmingham, rose to his feet and used parliamentary privilege to list some of the secret prisoners, the people who have lost their liberty in the UK behind closed doors; the court orders which detail the secret injunctions – not for the benefit of footballers or bankers, (although it was the issue of Fred Goodwin’s secret injunction that allowed the debate to be heard), but the injunctions, not mere ‘super-injunctions’ that the media could not mention, but ‘hyper-injunctions’ which even prevented the aggrieved citizen from appealing to their MP for help.Because we are allowed to speak of that which has been in Hansard, we can today speak of the misery of those whose lives have been turned upside down, in secret, with the added bonus of a special injunction from the judge which prevented them even turning to their MP.
UNQUOTE
The differences between what happens in England and Stalin's Russia are getting less obvious.
Fraudulent War Crime Inquiry Was Abused By The Investigators [ 22 March 2014 ]
The Iraqis making major allegations of murder, torture et cetera admitted they were lying. Their fraud was used by Public Interest Lawyers, a bunch of chancers on the make, set up by Phil Shiner, a corrupt Socialist. There were trips out to Beirut, flying business class, a five star hotel. Police were on this jolly too. They achieved millions in expenses. Can you guess who gets to pay for it? If you are not sure, just look in the mirror. Are these rogues going to be forced to pay back the money they made off with? Not a chance.
Third World Racist Hate Preacher Given £123 Thousand To Fight Deportation [31 January 2017 ]
QUOTE
Hani al-Sibai has been described as a ‘key influencer’ of the extremist Ansar al-Sharia movement which is alleged to have recruited Seifeddine Rezgui Yacoubi who gunned down 38 tourists, among them 30 Brits, in Tunisia in June 2015 [ See 2015 Sousse attacks ]..................The Hate Preacher arrived in Britain in 1994 as an asylum seeker. Owing to his involvement with Egyptian terror group Islamic Jihad in his native Egypt, the Hate Preacher was refused asylum two years later and jailed awaiting deportation for one year before being released on the grounds of ‘human rights’.........
He has remained in Britain ever since, residing in a three-storey £1million house in West London with his wife and children receiving an estimated £48,000 a year in benefits and given a car worth £16,000.
UNQUOTE
If he hates us so much why doesn't he go back to whichever ghastly Hellhole he came from?
Islamic Triple Murderer Cost Over £100,000 In Legal Aid [ 6 September 2021 ]
QUOTE
The jihadist killer who stabbed three people to death in the Reading terror attack won £107,000 in legal aid prior to his rampage.Libyan asylum seeker Khairi Saadallah, 26, was released from prison just 15 days before he launched the 'ruthlessly efficient' attack in Forbury Gardens, Reading, shortly before 7pm on June 20 last year.
History teacher James Furlong, 36, scientist David Wails, 49, and their friend Joseph Ritchie-Bennett, 39, were stabbed to death during the attack.
The killer, whose previous convictions include possessing knives, violence and criminal damage, was sentenced to three consecutive life sentences for the murders this year.
Now, figures show the killer's solicitors received £5,340 in legal aid for representing him at police stations between 2015 and 2020 and another £1,000 for a Court of Appeal case, which saw him released from jail 15 days before his attack in Reading
Saadallah's appearances at the crown court cost £94,219 and his legal costs at the magistrates' court prior to his release from prison were an additional £6,452, FOI figures seen by The Sun show.
David Spencer, of the Centre for Crime Prevention, told The Sun: 'It is wrong that a vast amount of taxpayers' money should end up in pockets of lawyers defending a terrorist whose guilt was never in doubt.'
In January Saadallah, who avoided deportation from the UK five times, admitted three counts of murder and three of attempted murder.
He was sentenced to three consecutive life sentences for the murders and 24 years imprisonment for the attempted murders.
UNQUOTE
No doubt the lawyers milking the Legal Aid Racket told him which lies were going to work. Notice too that he was let out of prison by five different magistrates. Are they simple minded or is it bad law?
s