Oil and War - War and Oil

Cause and effect? It could be. Bush is an oil man who went into politics and that means making war. Invading Iraq was about controlling oil. Invading Iran ditto. This is not to say  that Bush is not controlled by Zionists but of course Congress and the Senate are full of Zionist Jews. And with Wolfowitz, another warmongering thug who never served running the World Bank it is business as usual.

Of course it would much easier and much cheaper to buy the stuff on the open market but Jews don't like paying an honest price. Stealing it using the American army is their idea. So when the media tells us that things are awful in Darfur, wherever that might be, ask yourself why they don't tell us about the oil.

West's Greed For Oil Fuels Saddam Fever
QUOTE
Is the projected war against Iraq really turning into an oil war, aimed at safeguarding Western energy supplies as much as toppling a dangerous dictator and source of terrorism? Of course no one can doubt the genuine American hatred of Saddam Hussein, but recent developments in Washington suggest oil may loom larger than democracy or human rights in American calculations.

The alarmist briefing to the Pentagon by the Rand Corporation, leaked last week, talked about Saudi Arabia as 'the kernel of evil' and proposed that Washington should have a showdown with its former ally, if necessary seizing its oilfields which have been crucial to America's energy.
UNQUOTE
Politics are about oil. Simple enough, isn't it? The rest is window dressing. If war is what it takes, war is what it gets.

 

Chad Breaks With Sudan After Rebel Attack
QUOTE
Chad broke off diplomatic relations with Sudan on Friday and threatened to expel 200,000 Sudanese refugees, blaming its neighbor for a rebel attack that killed 350 in the capital............

The competition for power has become more intense  since the country began producing oil. An Exxon Mobil-led   consortium exported 133 million barrels of oil from Chad between October 2003 and December 2005, according to  the World Bank. Chad, which receives a 12.5 percent royalty on each barrel exported, earned $307 million, the bank said.
UNQUOTE

 

Gaza Gas Murder and Robbery
It turns out that it is even worse; that mass murder is not just a vote buying gimmick. The major objective is stealing gas fields from Gaza with the collusion of Tony Blair, the little swine who lied us into war with Iraq.

 

World Bank shuts Chad oil account
QUOTE
 "The oil revenue needs to be used for the welfare of    our youth instead of  being put aside for future generations    as the World Bank wants us to do,"  Chad's Foreign Minister   Ahmat Allami told the BBC's French service.

He denounced last week's move by the bank as foreign pressure  and an attack on Chad's  sovereignty, saying his government  needed  some of the oil money now to finance improvements in    health and education.

[World] Bank president Paul Wolfowitz accused Chad's government of acting "unilaterally" after the law  which Mr. Deby approved was passed by  parliament    two weeks ago.
UNQUOTE
Wolfowitz is one of the arrogant crooks who incited war in Iraq and killed thousands for the control of oil.


Oil unions mull withdrawal from nervy Nigerian delta
This one has disappeared briskly down the memory hole.


Nigerian output cut by 20% due to Terrorism
Local issues or foreign incitement? Locals wanting a slice of the action is my guess.
 

Nigerian Militants to Kill Hostages if US Man Dies  
Reuters has sent this one down the memory hole too.

 

Problems in Iran, Nigeria force Oil Prices Up Again
Locals want something out of the disruption,  local politicians see their chances or international cartels see incitement as a way of getting prices up. Take your pick. Cock up or conspiracy.


Sudan Oil Companies Complicit in Rights Abuses
Good news becomes bad news. Strike gold or whatever and the big boys move in to steal it.  But they have a story to feed the public.


The Rape of Darfur
Darfur means oil. Oil means money. Sorting the locals is the preferred option. Wilfred Thesiger used to run the place with a few native police. It is not that difficult.

 

Why Germany really lost World War II
The short answer, the simple answer is the lack of oil. It is why Auschwitz was set up to convert coal into petrol.

 


 

US Interests In Central Asia Are Oil, Oil, Oil [ FEBRUARY 12, 1998 ]
QUOTE
U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS
FEBRUARY 12, 1998
Mr. BEREUTER. I would like to proceed to the subject of the hearing for today, U.S. interests in the Central Asian Republics. I do have a statement. One hundred years ago, Central Asia was the arena for a great game played by Czarist Russia, Colonial Britain, Napoleon's France, and the Persian and the Ottoman Empires. Allegiances meant little during this struggle for empire building, where no single empire could gain the upper hand. One hundred years later, the collapse of the Soviet Union has unleashed a new great game, where the interests of the East India Trading Company have been replaced by those of Unocal and Total, and many other organizations and firms.
    Today the Subcommittee examines the interests of a new contestant in this new great game, the United States. The five countries which make up Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, attained their independence in 1991, and have once again captured worldwide attention due to the phenomenal reserves of oil and natural gas located in the region
    Stated U.S. policy goals regarding energy resources in this region include fostering the independence of the States and their ties to the West; breaking Russia's monopoly over oil and gas transport routes; promoting Western energy security through diversified suppliers; encouraging the construction of east-west pipelines that do not transit Iran; and denying Iran dangerous leverage over the Central Asian economies.......

    To begin, you may ask why is the United States active in the region? The United States has energy security, strategic, and commercial interests in promoting Caspian region energy development. We have an interest in strengthening global energy security through diversification, and the development of these new sources of supply. Caspian export routes would diversify rather than concentrate world energy supplies, while avoiding over-reliance on the Persian Gulf..........

    Four factors frame our policy. First, promoting multiple export routes. The Administration's policy is centered on rapid development of the region's resources and the transportation and sale of those resources to hard-currency markets to secure the independence of these new countries. Accordingly, our government has promoted the development of multiple pipelines and diversified infrastructure networks to open and integrate these countries into the global market and to foster regional cooperation......

    In general, we support those transportation solutions that are commercially viable and address our environmental concerns and policy objectives. Based on discussions with the companies involved, a Baku-Ceyhan pipeline appears to be the most viable option.....

Switching geography slightly, what is the status of proposals by Unocal and others to build a gas pipeline through Afghanistan to Pakistan?
UNQUOTE
Translation: They have oil. We want oil. We are prepared to go to war to get it. Spending billions, killing thousands; we do what it takes. Obama wants Oil. Osama is an excuse.

 

Afghanistan Invasion Explained - It's Oil [ 12 July 2009 ]
QUOTE
    The second option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean. One obvious route south would cross Iran, but this is foreclosed for American companies because of U.S. sanctions legislation. The only other possible route is across Afghanistan, which has of course its own unique challenges. The country has been involved in bitter warfare for almost two decades, and is still divided by civil war. From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of the pipeline we have proposed across Afghanistan could not begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders, and our company..........

    Unocal foresees a pipeline which would become part of a regional system that will gather oil from existing pipeline infrastructure in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. The 1,040-mile long oil pipeline would extend south through Afghanistan to an export terminal that would be constructed on the Pakistan coast. This 42-inch diameter pipeline will have a shipping capacity of one million barrels of oil per day. The estimated cost of the project, which is similar in scope to the trans-Alaska pipeline, is about $2.5 billion........

    Last October, the Central Asia Gas Pipeline Consortium, called CentGas, in which Unocal holds an interest, was formed to develop a gas pipeline which will link Turkmenistan's vast Dauletabad gas field with markets in Pakistan and possibly India. The proposed 790-mile pipeline will open up new markets for this gas, traveling from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Multan in Pakistan. The proposed extension would move gas on to New Delhi, where it would connect with an existing pipeline. As with the proposed Central Asia oil pipeline, CentGas can not begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place.
UNQUOTE
This evidence was given to the American Congress back in 1998. The 9/11 Job was just an excuse.

 

Afghanistan Big Oil And Truth [ 11 April 2010 ]
QUOTE
It has been revealed in the Indian media that efforts will be made to speed up the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline project next weekend [ Efforts on to revive TAPI gas pipeline project ], the outcome of which could seal the fate of thousands of British and other Western troops over the coming years. The conference, to be held in Turkmenistan’s capital, Ashkhabad, will be the first high-level meeting on the project for almost three years. It follows in the wake of Operation Moshtarak, the military offensive to wrest Afghanistan’s strategically important Helmand Province, through which the proposed pipeline will be built, from Taliban control.
UNQUOTE
You might wonder just why it is that British troops are going to protect a pipeline through enemy territory to supply India. Remember that Falklands oil is not on stream yet. The Foreign Office tried to get rid of it. Maggie beat them but their treachery cost men's lives. Now it is all happening again.

If any question
Why we died
Tell them because
Our fathers lied

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page

Updated on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 13:55:15