From
Dmitry
Rogozin: A Russian Nationalist Re-enters the Political Arena
Dmitry
Rogozin: A Russian Nationalist Re-enters the Political Arena by
Peter Stuyvesant
The Russian colonization of the northern
part of the Eurasian landmass can only be compared to the Anglo-Saxon
colonization of North-America in terms of historical significance for the rise
of the White race. Both expansions have secured sufficient land mass for
Whites beyond the European peninsula to develop a sizeable population to
persist. Nowadays, the Russians are as much in demographic and to some extent
cultural decay as their Anglo-Saxon brethren on the other side of the Bering
Straits. The birthrates are dropping under the replacement level and the lands
are prone to immigration from non-Whites. In the case of Russia the threat is
twofold – from the Causasian and Central-Asian Muslims and the Chinese.
Although Russia has a strong cultural and ethnic awareness, the leadership is
not always reflecting popular sentiment. Lately Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s ambassador
to NATO,
has vowed his return to Russian politics. This is very
interesting because he was actually ‘exiled’ as an ambassador because the
Putinist faction feared his rising popularity among the Russians. Rogozin was
the leading man of the nationalist
Congress of Russian Communities, which was founded by the
deceased general Lebed.
Rogozin has noticed similarities between
immigration in the West and the East: Like the West, Russia has come under
unprecedented immigration pressure. Our immigration is not justified in
terms of the economy and is extremely dangerous politically and socially. His vocal opposition against immigration is
not merely economic, but also outspokenly ethnically motivated: Natives of those [North Caucaus] republics
defiantly violate the Russian cultural standard. Some peoples in Russia are
more equal than others, and the Russian people are now in the position of
the discriminated [against] majority. He calls for the “re-nationalization of the Russian people,
re-establishment of the spirit of statehood…and resurrection of historical
memory and great Russian culture.” In 2003 Rogozin became head of the
nationalist Rodina [Motherland] coalition. After being forced out of that
position, he became involved with the Movement Against Illegal Immigration,
“championing the rights of ethnic Russians and organizing nationalist
demonstrations.” While head of Rodina, the party put on a
television ad starring Rogozin: The video shows three surly Azerbaijanis
eating watermelon and throwing the peels on the ground; to make their
nationality clear, Azerbaijani music is playing in the background. A
dignified Russian mother is walking by pushing her child in a pram, stepping
on the peels. One of the Azerbaijanis insults the Russian lady. All this is
witnessed by Rogozin and his vice president; this time Terminator music
starts playing in the background. They ask the Azerbaijanis to “clean the
space”, but the Azerbaijanis ignore them. Then Rogozin puts a firm hand on
one of the Azerbaijanis, and demands of him: “Do you understand Russian?”
That’s when the logo of Rodina appears, and the words below the logo say “We
will clear Moscow of the dirt”. [Emphasis in text] The imagery of defending a Russian woman and
her baby against foreign men is particularly striking. Imagine a similar ad
aired by a US political party directed against immigrants being aired on the
major television networks. The independence of the former Soviet
republics in the Caucasus and Central Asia has reversed the ethnic tables. In
the Soviet era, it was the Russians who colonized those republics, but now the
migration flows are reversed and Russia is being flooded by nationalities from
the empoverished former republics. In some way, this is similar to the trend
in the West, where colonizing countries were confronted by the influx of
immigrants from former colonies in Asia and Africa. In the case of Russia
there is actually an even greater peril than the steady migration from the
former Soviet republics and that is the influx of millions of Chinese. Here are the facts: There are 10 million
Russians and other minorities in Siberia, while there 100 million people who
live on the Chinese side of the border with Russia. Now there are 250,000
legal Chinese immigrants in Russia, but given the above facts there will be
more to come. Siberia is the backyard of China and full of resources which
China will need for a sustained economic growth. Chinese colonization, whether
planned or spontanuous, will jeopardize Russian and subconsequently White
dominance of the northern part of the Eurasian landmass. The question is
whether America should persist in antagonizing Russia instead of reaching out
to check Chinese expansion in East Asia. Meanwhile Dmitry Rogozin is beating the drum
in Russia against immigration,
partially based on his experience in the West: The reason for the failure of
multiculturalism in Europe is a result of the reaction to the European
Nazism and fascism, which is “another extreme”. It has not been beneficial:
Europe’s Muslims are stronger religiously and have more solidarity than the
native population. Rogozin acknowledges that Russia and Europe
face the same dangers of immigration and Muslim demographic and cultural
expansion. He has dubbed his cause the ‘Russian question’ to define his
politics as of historical importance: This is the first time the Russian ethnic
population has begun to mobilize on such a scale and with such intensity
since WWII. The Russian question is the central nerve of Russia’s modern
politics. Not only do the country’s stability and integrity depend on the
resolution of the Russian issue, but so does the vector of its historic
development. Let’s hope that Rogozin rises to power in
Russia—and for the rise of a ‘Rogozin’ in America and elsewhere throughout the
West.
QUOTE
September 10, 2011
Many of us have experienced the Cold War and
identify Russia with communism and authoritarianism, or at least as an
‘Eastern power’ instead of a potential ally of the West. But we should not
forget that it was the
Swedish Viking-leader Rurik who united the Slavic tribes east of
Poland under a dynasty which would last until the Revolution of 1917. It was
Czar Ivan IV (the Terrible) who in the 16th century finally broke the
Muslim-Mongol power which had been a threat for Europe since the hordes of
Ögödei Khan’s arrived in the 13th century. In the following
centuries the Russians expanded beyond the Ural mountains which led to the
conquest of a large part of the Eurasian landmass and the White dominance over
it. It was not until the defeat at the hands of the Japanese in 1905 that the
Russian expansion was checked.
Dmitry Rogozin
UNQUOTE
It sounds good to me. It will sound good to a lot of
nationalists.