Antonin Scalia was a good judge, the supreme advocate of Originalism on the Supreme Court. At all events The Guardian hates him, just like the Wikipedia. That is a pretty convincing argument for me. He was not a Marxist or an enemy of America. The CNN report is sympathetic as well as honest; saying that his political significance is the real issue - see Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court justice, dies at 79 - CNN Politics. Notice that the Wiki complains about him using scathing language. He knew bad law and bad judgments when he saw them. Why not say so? A lawyer's appreciation is Chronicles Magazine - see Antonin Scalia’s Flexible Constitution. He was followed on by Neil Gorsuch; this is good news.
Antonin Scalia ex Wiki
Antonin Gregory Scalia (March 11, 1936 – February 12/13, 2016)[8] was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 until his death in 2016. Appointed to the Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, Scalia was described as the intellectual anchor for the originalist and textualist position in the Court's conservative wing.[9]Scalia was born in Trenton, New Jersey. He attended public grade school, Xavier High School in Manhattan, and then college at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. He obtained his law degree from Harvard Law School and spent six years in a Cleveland law firm, before he became a law school professor at the University of Virginia. In the early 1970s, he served in the Nixon and Ford administrations, eventually as an Assistant Attorney General. He spent most of the Carter years teaching at the University of Chicago, where he became one of the first faculty advisers of the fledgling Federalist Society. In 1982, Ronald Reagan appointed him as judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.[10] In 1986, Reagan appointed him to the Supreme Court. Scalia was asked few difficult questions by the Senate Judiciary Committee, and was unanimously confirmed by the Senate, becoming the first Italian-American justice.[11]
Scalia served on the Court for nearly thirty years, during which time he espoused a conservative jurisprudence and ideology, advocating textualism in statutory interpretation and originalism in constitutional interpretation. He was a strong defender of the powers of the executive branch, believing presidential power should be paramount in many areas. He opposed affirmative action and other policies that treated minorities as special groups. He filed separate opinions in many cases and often castigated the Court's majority in his minority opinions using scathing language.