Election 2010

A general election must be called in England before June this year. The timing is in Brown's hands. 6 May is likely. In the run up MPs are concentrating on what really matters to them which is to say getting elected. A fair number have realized that they are not going to get away with it because they got caught with their fingers in the till. The main stream media are part of the fun too. They are not just reporting; they are campaigning too. One enemy that they all love to hate is the British National Party or BNP. The BBC has a formal obligation to tell it like it is; one they treat with contemptuous indifference. They proved that when they attacked Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP on Question Time. They were more like a lynch mob than a national broadcaster.

Here is comment from various sources. Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

Blue State Digital
Is a left wing, American media campaign outfit. It colludes with the Labour Party and Searchlight which run by left wing criminals.  See what they have to say for themselves at http://www.bluestatedigital.com/

 

BNP Candidate Standing Against A Racist Jew [ 17 March 2010 ]
QUOTE
The British Democratic Party has announced that well-known activist Lynne Mozar will be its candidate in the Buckingham seat and will campaign against sitting MP John Bercow’s plans to actively discriminate against white British people as outlined in a parliamentary review published in January this year. “Mr Bercow’s Speaker’s Conference said it believed that ‘parliament is too white, middle-class, heterosexual, male and able-bodied’,” Ms Mozar said.
UNQUOTE
How many black, female, lesbian, lower class cripples are the Tories putting up? About the same as Labour which to say none whatsoever. Bercow does not qualify on any of these grounds. Mrs Mozar does. Cameron is trying it on with Sam Gyimah. Perhaps he is not a cannibal. He won't be getting too many Tory votes.

 

The Sun Advertises BNP Policies [ 17 March 2010 ]
QUOTE
A DAD branded the British National Party "despicable" last night for trying to recruit his son by sending leaflets to his school. Tom Hunter, 13, was targeted by the right-wing extremists after he stood for the UK Youth Parliament. He was shocked when he opened a letter left for him at the school office and found it contained BNP leaflets. Tom said: "I was appalled. They are fascist and racist." Dad Paul, 47, a lawyer from Newton Aycliffe, Co Durham, said: "Targeting anybody so young is despicable. "Everything the BNP stands for, I find disgusting."........

A BNP spokesman said Tom's parents were "narrow-minded" for not liking the party, adding: "If he's too young to be sent information, he's too young to take part in a Youth Parliament."
UNQUOTE
So look at this picture and see for yourself because the BBC is not going to tell you where the BNP stands. Then think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

You just might think the lad's father is a racist bigot who hates England.

 

Labour ‘loses a third of voters’ [ 9 March 2010 ]
Labour has lost a third of its vote since the last election but the Tories are still facing the prospect of a hung parliament if they win the election, according to a Metro/Harris poll..... Just 66 per cent of those who backed Labour in 2005 intend to vote for the party now, the research showed. It compares with 86 per cent of Conservative supporters who say they will back the party again. The Liberal Democrats have also shed a third of their 2005 voters, according to our poll. However, the Conservatives, who have an eight-point lead, will still fall 18 seats short of claiming an outright majority in the Commons.
UNQUOTE
Now why would that be? Because people know what they have done to us is one answer? Where have all those votes gone? We will see come the day. We will also see politicians claiming that they care about the people of England but we all know they lie.

 

54% Say Immigration Policy Will Decide The Way They Vote [ 9 March 2010 ]
QUOTE
AN opinion poll by Opinium Research over the weekend has found that immigration policy will be a key issue for voters at the General Election.

The online survey of 2,000 people revealed that seven out of ten of those questioned felt that immigration had had a “negative” impact on society, putting a strain on housing, hospitals, schools and social cohesion, while one in five voters said immigration had already had a negative impact on their local community.

There was general dissatisfaction with the immigration policies of the three main parties with just 18% supporting the Conservatives, 11% Labour and 7% the Lib-Dems on the issue. A staggering 61% of people said they couldn’t support the policies of the three main parties on immigration.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationWatch UK acknowledged it was an important poll. “It is further evidence that the political classes are ignoring the strongly held views of a large section of the electorate,” he said.

But what was of particular interest to the British National Party was Opinium finding that 54% of voters considered immigration policies “very important” or the “main issue” that would determine the way they voted.
UNQUOTE
Labour chose to abandon the working classes and thought they would get away with because the little people had nowhere else to go. Now they have the BNP.

 

Election 2010 [ 23 February 2010 ]
Sean Gabb, the director of the Libertarian Alliance puts a well reasoned view based on the corruption of the two main political parties.

The 2010 General Election:
Advice on How to Vote
By Sean Gabb
There must, within the next few months, be a general election in England. I will not presume to advise my readers on how to vote. I will, instead, explain how I am at present inclined to vote, and will invite any comments that may arise.

My present inclination is to vote for the Conservative Party. I do not need to be told that these people are, for the most part, trash. I have been mixing in Conservative circles for thirty years now, and I have grown used to the idea of running home after most meetings for a bath. For the avoidance of doubt, let me admit what I think would be the nature of any Government led by David Cameron. It would not withdraw from the European Union. It would not roll back the multicultural elements of our police state. It would not require the police and other public bodies to behave with more humanity or common sense than they now do after thirteen years of Labour tyranny. It would not restore freedom of speech and association as they were understood in 1960. The identity card scheme might be cancelled - but not the national identity database that makes the scheme possible. Any cuts in government spending will fall on the services that are the excuse for such spending. None of the - often very well-paid - administrative and support jobs that are the real purpose will be cut. There will be no tax cuts. There will be no change to our external policy of slavish subservience to the United States. The "climate change" charade might even be become more scandalous.

This being so, why do I propose to vote Conservative? The answer is that a Conservative Government would probably continue with most of the suicidal or simply demented policies of the Blair and Brown Governments. But, at the end of five years, it would then allow a free election as these things have been commonly understood in England. A re-elected Labour Government would not. When these beasts in human form lied their way to office back in 1997, they came in with the same assumptions as Hitler had in 1933. They did not regard themselves as having acquired a limited and renewable leasehold interest, but as having inherited the freehold. They and their clients would never again have to sell their services in any open market. They would reorder the State wholly to their own interest. No private sphere, no ancient and immemorial rights would stand in their way. 1997 was Year Zero of their Thousand Year Reich.

So long as it was reasonably plain that they could win the next few elections - if with a dwindling fraction of the total possible vote - they were willing to keep most of the old rules. Even so, they took steps to cartelize politics with party registration and "human rights" laws that now allow them, given courage, to shut down dissident organizations like the British National Party. For the past few years, however, they have lived in constant fear of losing the next election. And, if Labour does lose, that might cause the implosion of their Party. Therefore, if they do somehow win after all, we can be reasonably sure that they will never allow another free election. I doubt if they would go so far as abolishing elections, or openly rigging them. But they are already talking about schemes of "electoral reform" that would keep them permanently in office - even if office must be shared with the Liberal Democrats. They would also tighten the party registration laws, so that only those parties willing to guarantee the existing order would be allowed to run in elections. They might also extend their control over local politicians to Members of Parliament - setting up some system whereby Members who were too outspoken could be removed for "misconduct".

For all their faults, the Conservatives would not do any of these things. Therefore, a vote for the Conservatives would be a vote for keeping the system open for a real party of national restoration - whatever that might be.

There is one other consideration. This is that, while a Cameron Government with a majority of less than fifty would be little different from Labour, a majority of more than a hundred would bring in new Members who had not been hand-picked for their willingness to obey. A big Conservative majority might force a Cameron Government to take a more liberal and patriotic line on the main issues.

Many of my friends assure me they will vote for the UK Independence Party or for the BNP - or, in one case, for an Islamic Party. I understand their frustration with the existing political arrangements. However, the main purpose of a general election is to send a majority into Parliament from which a Government will be drawn. Whatever individual chance Nigel Farage or Nick Griffin might have in their constituencies, the majority party after the next election must be either Labour or the Conservatives. I wish it were otherwise. But that is the choice we have to face. Do we want a pack of smirking hypocrites, who will leave office after another election? Or do we want what I have already called beasts in human form, who will never leave office thereafter, short of revolution?

Some of my friends insist that voting for minor parties will bring on a hung Parliament. This might be true. However, a hung Parliament would not give decisive weight to any of these minority parties. It would simply result in an auction between the two big parties for the Liberal Democrats. That would be about as bad as a Labour Majority. The choice remains Labour or Conservative.

Am I wrong? Is there some other viable option that I am overlooking? I look forward to hearing if there is. After all, if I do vote Conservative, it will be with forefinger and thumb clamped hard over my nose.

NB—Sean Gabb's book, Cultural Revolution, Culture War: How Conservatives Lost England, and How to Get It Back, can be downloaded for free from http://tinyurl.com/ya4pzuh

 

Sam Gyimah
WILL Sam Gyimah, prospective black Tory MP for the safe seat of Surrey East, bring the kind of real-world experience the newly inclusive Tory party craves in its MPs? The 33-year-old former Oxford Union president, CBI Entrepreneur of the Future and ex-Goldman Sachs banker has been the director of three liquidated companies and one that went into receivership. Clearstone Training & Recruiting [ in liquidation ] and its two heavily insolvent subsidiaries, involved in training HGV lorry drivers, crashed in 2007. Gyimah had been a Clearstone director and shareholder since 2003. Clearstone owed creditors £3.45 million; its business was sold for £100,000; unsecured creditors received 1.5p in the pound. Meanwhile the Resource Connection [ dissolved ] went into receivership in 2007 owing creditors almost £2 million. And another Gyimah company, WORKOLOGY NET has been warned by Companies House that it will be struck off. Parent Career Ability  has accumulated losses of more than £2.5 million. Sam talks the talks He does not walk the walk.

Cameron wants him. Cameron is welcome to him. Would you want to put your fingers anywhere near his mouth?
PS Source Private Eye 1257/6