Jews do tell the truth from time to time. Perhaps they do it
because it is the truth. Often it is because they can use it as a weapon to
conceal their lies and their agenda. On this occasion it maybe honesty. Normal
practice is described by Jews Versus Truth.
Jews Tell The Truth About
Anti-Semitism
This is why in the last few days there have been claims that anti-Semitism is
increasing in the UK. The MSM do their best to claim that this so called rise in anti-Semitic
incidents is related to our recent electoral success, but unfortunately for them
they can’t present any evidence to support these accusations, because none
exists! The Jewish Chronicle has published an interesting article about the history
of anti-Semitism in the UK. We report this in full because Anthony Julius, the author of this book about
anti-Semitism, clearly states that the British National Party has had nothing to
do with anti-Semitism. ‘Anthony Julius is the best solicitor in London”, a prominent barrister told
me some years ago. Since then, Julius has become a public figure. He acted for
Deborah Lipstadt when David Irving brought – and lost – a libel case against her
for labelling him a Holocaust denier. Julius also acted for Princess Diana in
her divorce. “He is a Jewish intellectual and Labour supporter,” the Daily
Telegraph declared, “and less likely to feel restrained by considerations of
fair play.” “I’d be very worried if I were the Royal Family,” says a Cambridge
don who taught him. “He’ll get lots of money out of them.” Modern English anti-Semitism, Julius argues, is a matter of the “lazy reflex”,
and the “casual remark”, not deep-seated hostility. The civil liberties of
English Jews have not been seriously threatened in modern times, while the open
expression of anti-Semitic views would disqualify their holder from public life.
In England today, anti-Semitism is definitely not respectable. Admittedly, the British
National Party, whose attitude to Jews is at best
equivocal, gains far more electoral support today than Mosley’s fascists did in
the 1930s, even though economic conditions were far worse then. Unlike the BNP,
the British Union of Fascists never fought a general election nor did it ever
win a seat on a local council. But electoral support for the BNP is based more
on dislike of immigration, particularly non-white immigration, than
anti-Semitism. Most people in this country probably neither know nor care whether someone is
Jewish or not. How many know or care that three of the last six Lord Chief
Justices were Jewish? How many knew or cared that Michael Howard, Leader of the
Opposition from 2003 to 2005, was Jewish? Did the choice of a Jewish party
leader swing a single vote to or from the Conservatives? I doubt it. Nevertheless, in 2009, attacks on Jews in Britain, including violence and the
bullying of schoolchildren, reached a record high. Gordon Brown called them
“deeply troubling”. The reason, apparently, is a “protest” against Israel’s
actions in Gaza. “In the modern world,” Philip Roth declares in Operation
Shylock, “the Jew has perpetually been on trial; still today the Jew is on trial
in the person of the Israeli.” Julius is right to regard the dark underside of anti-Zionism, the singling
out and delegitimising of Israel, as an ideological, “postmodern” and dangerous
version of Jew-hatred. It has, he believes, “become part of the common sense of
present times”. Israel remains “the only state in the world whose legitimacy is
widely denied and whose destruction is publicly advocated and threatened”.
Anti-Zionism has served to legitimise genocidal aims and Holocaust denial, which
would otherwise be anathema to liberal-minded people. “Mr Ahmedinejad may not
know much about the Holocaust,” a Guardian journalist quipped in 2006, “but he
certainly knows how to work a crowd.” As Conor Cruise O’Brien pointed out over 20 years ago in his book, The Siege,
still to my mind the best history of Zionism in English, the question, “Does
Israel have a right to exist?” is, historically, associated with another
question, “Do the Jews have a right to exist?” It would be difficult to deny a relationship between the two questions. In
the 19th century, anti-Semites argued that Jews alone should be deprived of civil
rights. Today they argue that Jews alone should be deprived of national rights. This form of anti-Zionism, unlike traditional anti-Semitism, is championed by
elements on the left, and is predominantly secular, though powerfully reinforced
by a minority segment of Muslim opinion. In a survey in 2006, 30 per cent of
British Muslims believed that Israel had no right to exist, but only four per
cent believed that the Holocaust did not happen. Sadly, second-generation Muslims were more likely than their parents to
believe that 9/11 was perpetrated by an American/Israeli conspiracy. There is
clearly much to do for those working in the field of Jewish/Muslim community
relations. Anthony Julius avoids the two main pitfalls in books on
anti-Semitism –
exaggeration and self-righteousness. Indeed, Julius is more critical of Israel
than I would be. Israel’s options seem to me far more limited than Julius
implies. Perhaps Israel, as Conor Cruise O’Brien believed, can hardly be other
than it is. Trials of the Diaspora, the first comprehensive history of English
anti-Semitism, is both thorough and scholarly. But it should be read alongside
another book – Philosemitism, by William and Hilary Rubinstein. Otherwise we
shall all become paranoid. Many nationalists might disagree with Mr Julius’ views on Israel and Zionism
but that is not the point. The point is, this article clearly states that attacks on those of the
Jewish race are carried out by leftists and Muslims. We knew this already because Gerry Gable [ a vicious Jew
running
Searchlight
] has distanced himself from the
thuggish UAF because of their anti-Semitism. As for holocaust denial no one in MSM has ever attacked any Muslim for
supporting it (many do) or taken legal action against them. But as we all know there is one law for them and another law for us. GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS
QUOTE
One of the many lies the MSM [
Main Stream Media ] tell about the
BNP is that we are anti-Semitic.
UNQUOTE
If Jews claim that the
British National Party
is not evil I am prone to believe them but also wonder why? Is it an attempt to
infiltrate and control as they have done with Labour, Tory and Liberal? Quite
possibly.