Critical Kosher Theory ex Occidental Observer
CriticalKosherTheory is primarily derived from
1) the 2019 consumer research conducted by the
KosChertified? Team titled “A
Quantitative Study on Kosher Certification: Seal
Visibility and Public Awareness,” 2) the
book by Suzanne Bousquet:
From Kosher to Halal: When Greed, Politics and the Sneaky Destruction of Western Civilization Intertwine
and, 3) from the experiences of our staff in the
past three years investigating the kosher
certification industry in pursuit of delivering
answers to The Kosher Question while advocating
for religious freedom and consumer rights in a
fair and honest way for all citizens.
1. Without deception, the kosher industry would not be as
ubiquitous as it is. Reasoning: the vast majority of
the revenue feeding this religious enterprise comes mostly from
outside Jewish congregations. Over five decades ago rabbis from
kosher agencies claimed that they kept their hekhsher (kosher seal)
unusually small so as not to offend non-Jewish consumers, and today
they claim that they have no control over the size of kosher seals –
even though they stipulate the strictest contracts. Our study
suggests that a Deceptive Trade Practice is in play among the
companies and agencies. We estimate that this enterprise would be
entirely different, perhaps 5% or less of its current size, if
completely run by religious volunteers from the congregations that
observe Kashrus. We discovered that keeping consumers in the dark
with little transparency and a lot of obscurity is key to sustaining
and growing their business. Arguably, the kosher agencies can
stipulate in contractual words a mandatory legibly sized hekhsher
(kosher seal) to be displayed on labels with the morally correct
addition of the bold text “KOSHER CERTIFIED”. But they don’t.
2. If label transparency was honest, kosher brands might
lose business to NKC products
NOT Kosher Certified. Reasoning: Our surveys indicate
that more than half of consumers desire no religious intervention in
the production of their food or they desire a “higher” transparency
indicated on the labeling when this is the case. If this group was
“kosher aware” and if companies were legally forced to display large
and clear kosher labeling, companies might opt for keeping away from
kosher certification to access this greater share of the market. Of
course, there are other factors pressuring companies to
kosher-certify their goods that we are not privy to, for instance,
distribution and supermarket management demands.
3. When dollar signs start entering the religious aspects
of Kashrus, it is perverted with greed and corruption, even in
“holy” Jerusalem. Reasoning: Israel’s
ynetnews reveals a darker side of the kosher certification
business occurring in the Jewish State itself. If such criminality
can occur among the rabbis and inspectors in Jerusalem, then similar
or worse conditions may exist in America where the kosher revenue is
largely derived from outsiders of the Jewish congregations. This
behavior was further leaked by professionals at the International
Food Safety and Quality Network in their forum, and by Jewish
journalists themselves at the New
York Daily News.
4. Give ‘em an inch, they’ll take a mile.
Reasoning: There are plenty of laws protecting the kosher-keeper,
and plenty of IRS law that benefits religious organizations, but no
laws protecting the consumer from religious groups co-opting secular
businesses, instituting their particular rules and laws, and
wringing out revenue from companies where consumers have no reason
to suspect outside religious involvement. These consumers are
unfairly being taken advantage of, and the parties involved in the
kosher enterprise have shown no compassion or even tolerance for how
they may feel regarding outside religious intervention in their
secular livelihood. Further, given that approximately one million
observant kosher keepers are actively buying kosher certified
products with deceptively obscured transparency of kosher seals,
their silence must be an admission that they find no shame in this
religion-based fraud.
Looking back into history…
Jewish women rioted en masse in the early 1900s, resulting in
national kosher laws across America protecting kosher-keepers. But
kosher laws protecting kosher keepers were not good enough.
Preferential IRS laws for religious organizations allow kosher
agencies more protections by keeping their finances out of public
scrutiny. It is one matter to have laws for protection of particular
groups. It is another matter entirely to take advantage of people
outside the specific religious community, especially where they are
forced into becoming unwitting contributors to the financial gain of
a religious congregation they do not belong to. This is immoral; it
degrades religious freedom for the out-group. Most Americans
perceive religious organizations as moral and honest, but here we
find a business practice throughout the industrialized world that is
tied directly to untouchable religious NGOs that do all within its
power to conceal the facts from consumers.
Our very own Federal Trade Commission ignores whistle blowers
on the kosher industry. As a result, as generous as the American
government has been to accept religious pluralism and to accommodate
protection for the kosher industry and kosher keepers, no effort is
extended to protect the general consumer who is not a kosher keeper.
The insiders of the kosher industry do not seem to have concerns for
the out-group, consistently citing marketing data from pro-kosher
associations.
5. When food companies contract with the kosher
certification industry, there is a veil of silence that shrouds the
details that its patrons inquire about. Reasoning: The
companies won’t tell us, so we can’t tell you until an insider
whistle blower appears on the scene. Our experience in confronting
food companies with questions usually results in silence, or
incredibly vague responses with little detail. Our educated
presumption is that there are non-disclosure or confidentiality
agreements contracted by the kosher agencies and food companies
keeping the details in the dark.
6. Major efforts are undertaken to suppress “kosher
awareness” from the public, but no efforts to curtail Talmudic
“separatist” laws like Bishul Akum. Reasoning: Articles
from the ADL and Reveal News magazine attempt to scare away
inquisitive minds on The Kosher Question, but are they willing to
look into OU Kosher’s own article on
three post-Torah Kashrus proscriptions that enforce separation and
xenopobia? Of course not.
After reading the article linked above by OU Kosher, “Bishul
Akum: Playing with Fire,” a serious double standard is exposed with
respect to the entire enterprise of kosher certification. Clearly,
these religious experts prescribe that strict observers of the
Kashrus dietary laws are to be highly exclusionary, to avoid gifts
(like a meal “fit to be served at a royal table” or a bottle of
wine) from members of outgroups as a measure to limit socialization,
new friendships, and closer relationships. And yet the
behavior of this industry is towards imposing its religious rules
and dogma onto “others” outside their synagogues with little to no
possibility of escape. If this industry was tolerant and fair to
other religions and peoples, they would insist with the contracting
food companies to produce equivalent products free from kosher
certification, thus permitting choice. But they don’t, and so the
whole application of these proscriptions within the kosher world is
the ultimate hypocrisy.
7. Kosher Supremacy rules over America, and food
companies are complicit in depriving EQUITY
to people of diverse faiths and identities. Reasoning:
Synonyms of the word ‘Supremacy’ are Authority, Control,
Predominance, and Hegemony. The kosher industry enjoys all of these,
and more. There are no major churches, religious organizations or
advocacy groups working on behalf of consumers and citizens who are
against this practice of kosher certification. There is no equity
and religious freedom for the vast majority. They are effectively
marginalized. You will not find a kosher-certified product “X” and
the same branded product “X” without kosher-certification for those
consumers who would like to abstain from Jewish intervention.
8. It is easier and more profitable to co-opt existing
industry and make it serve ancient particularism of Kashrus law than
to build its own industry from scratch. Reasoning:
History indicates that the Jewish community had the financial
resources to fund an entrepreneurial and niche kosher food industry
to serve specialty kosher markets and kosher sections of
supermarkets or general stores. But this would have necessitated
full funding by the Jewish community. By contracting directly with
existing producers, the kosher community built a certification
industry on mostly non-Jewish capital and have created a highly
profitable enterprise. Of course, we don’t know how profitable it
is, because that information is shrouded in secrecy.
9. Mammon rules. As society “progresses”, more secular
companies submit and pay to implement ancient kosher law
requirements, while few observe “Blue Laws” of old Christian
culture in Western Society that allowed a day for rest and worship.
Reasoning: Businesses closed on Sundays in the 1960s
and earlier because of local laws that eroded away in time. However,
the practice was a religious and moral one serving the culture of
the times. Today, all but Chick-Fil-A stores have shed this Sunday
closing on economic grounds. But more and more companies are
submitting to kosher agencies and their stipulations on ancient
dietary laws. Early America was dominated by Christian morals and
culture, especially by the early settlers. But this culture has been
transformed, and it is clear that either we are living in a purely
Judaized culture, or mammon is now running the show. Or both.
10. Ubiquitous kosher certification, as it currently is
implemented, is a strategy that abuses the last vestige of moral
fiber and good will that bind the American society.
Reasoning: Edward Bernays, a Jewish man named as one of the top 100
influential Americans of the twentieth century by Life magazine, a
nephew of Sigmund Freud, and an expert on public relations and
propaganda, stated: “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of
the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important
element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen
mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the
true ruling power of our country.”
Well, one organized habit of Americans nationwide is buying
kosher certified products, but 90% may not know it, and people
generally don’t like being duped. What little mention there is in
American news articles regarding kosher food is entirely positive,
with none of the many downsides. One 1954 speech made by a member of
the Daughters of the American Revolution (Mrs. Marian Strack) took
aim at this business, and the press struck hard against her,
silencing honest and balanced debate regarding all aspects of this
matter. Our food culture and all the particular interests that this
undisclosed kosher revenue feeds have been shaped by figures unseen
to the public.
After nearly one century, food manufacturers refuse to
produce equitable products free from kosher certification aside from
their kosher-certified versions. Access to the national “free”
marketplace will eventually be driven by submission to the dogmatic
kosher agencies’ will.
As Ms. Bousquet sums up at the end of her masterpiece, From
Kosher to Halal:
The accommodations described as ‘reasonable’ directly oppose
the historic secularism model, the only guarantee of equality of
treatment for all citizens. This project must rest on clear
positions applicable to all issues of religious intrusion into
civic and public space. No violations should have been
tolerated, and should not be in the future. … We must, quite
simply, determine the following: (1) What norms are acceptable
for the public sphere (commerce)?, (2) What kind of practices
should be relegated entirely to the private sphere? and (3) What
norms demonstrably contravene animal welfare? [referring to
controversial religious slaughter]. … The last word belongs to
consumers.
Allow us to conclude with this brief comment: When the masses
discover the schemes, the trust will be lost. But is CriticalKosherTheory
just one facet of a larger
group evolutionary strategy? That remains to be answered.
This article originally
appeared at the
KosChertified? website—the go-to place for information on the
kosher racket.