Trahison des Clercs

Trahison des Clercs is a French phrase meaning Treason of the intellectuals. It is the title of a well known book by Julien Benda, a Jew published in 1927. Political reasons for betraying your own include the very real threat of The GULAG in the USSR or dismissal from a university post in the West. The alleged treason that Benda refers to was that of Patriots & Nationalists, the people that Jews, especially Zionist crazies call Racists. Of course Jews are the world's greatest Racists. Their victims in Gaza know a lot about that - apart from those who were murdered. Using those who run countries & the influential generally to betray the rest of us, to abuse Representative Democracy is perfectly genuine betrayal. It is what the Puppet Masters are doing to this day.   

In The Occidental Quarterly of Spring 2018 Andrew Joyce Ph.D. tells us about #Agobard of Lyon, an early objector to Jews as hostile aliens. Agobard discovered the hard way, contrary to his beliefs and assumptions that #Louis the Pious, his King and Emperor was a Traitor, pandering to Jews. Giving them preference was, no doubt profitable for Louis. It cost his people though.

The basic point, Jews Subverting the ruling class is confirmed by the Jew, Benjamin Ginsberg in his book Fatal Embrace. Doctor Ginsberg's thesis is that Jews worm their way into positions of power & abuse it. Then it all goes wrong.

In these cases it is the treason of Kings & politicians rather than intellectuals.
PS The Wiki should be read with caution. It is not reliable when there is an agenda.

 

Trahison des Clercs ex Your Dictionary
Trahison des clercs is a French phrase that is defined as the treason of the intellectuals, and is used to represent the dishonest practices or values by an artist, writer or person teaching or attending school............

Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/trahison-des-clercs#DCCOW6tBsw4ymrU8.99

trahison des clercs

image: http://cf.ydcdn.net/1.0.1.56/images/dictionaries/websters5.jpg

a compromising of intellectual integrity, esp. for political reasons

Origin of trahison des clercs

Fr, literally , treason of the scholars
Noun

(plural trahisons des clercs)

  1. A compromise of intellectual integrity by members of an intelligentsia.
Origin

From French: trahison (“treason"¯) + des (“of the"¯) (a contraction of de (“of"¯) + les (“the"¯ (plural), “hoi"¯)) + clercs (“clerks"¯, “scholars"¯) = treason of the clerks; originally adopted from the title of the French philosopher and novelist Julien Benda's 1927 book La Trahison des Clercs (whose first English translation bore the title The Betrayal of the Intellectuals).

English Wiktionary. Available under CC-BY-SA license.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/trahison-des-clercs#DCCOW6tBsw4ymrU8.99

 

Julien Benda ex Wiki
Julien Benda
(26 December 1867, Paris – 7 June 1956, Fontenay-aux-Roses) was a French philosopher and novelist. He remains famous for his short book, La Trahison des Clercs (The Betrayal of the Intellectuals).

Life
Born into a Jewish family, Benda became a master of French belles-lettres. Yet he believed that science was superior to literature as a method of inquiry. He disagreed with Henri Bergson, the leading light of French philosophy of his day.

Benda is now best remembered for his short 1927 book La Trahison des Clercs, a work of considerable influence. It was translated into English in 1928 by Richard Aldington; the U.S. edition had the title The Treason of the Intellectuals, while the British edition had the title The Great Betrayal. It was republished in 2006 as The Treason of the Intellectuals with a new introduction by Roger Kimball. This polemical essay argued that European intellectuals in the 19th and 20th century had often lost the ability to reason dispassionately about political and military matters, instead becoming apologists for crass nationalism, War Mongering and Racism. Benda reserved his harshest criticisms for his fellow Frenchmen Charles Maurras and Maurice Barrčs. Benda defended the measured and dispassionate outlook of classical civilization, and the internationalism of traditional Christianity.

Other works by Benda include Belphégor (1918), Uriel's Report (1926), and Exercises of a Man Buried Alive (1947), an attack on the contemporary French celebrities of his time. Most of the titles in the bibliography below were published during the last three decades of Benda's long life; he is emphatically a 20th-century author. Moreover, Benda survived the German occupation of France, 1940–44, and the Vichy regime despite being a Jew and having called the Germans "one of the plagues of the world".

 

Agobard of Lyon ex Wiki     
Agobard of Lyon
(c. 779–840) was a Spanish-born priest and archbishop of Lyon, during the Carolingian Renaissance. The author of multiple treatises, ranging in subject matter from the iconoclast controversy to Spanish Adoptionism to critiques of the Carolingian royal family, Agobard is best known for his critiques of Jewish religious practices and political power in the Frankish realm. He was succeeded by Amulo of Lyons.

Early life   
A native of Spain, Agobard moved to Lyon in 792. He was ordained as a priest c. 804, and was well-liked by the archbishop of Lyon, Leidrad (r. 799–816). At some point, Agobard was ordained as a chorbishop, or assistant bishop. Controversy arose in 814, when the aging Leidrad retired into a monastery, appointing Agobard as his successor. While emperor Louis the Pious did not object to the appointment, some of the other bishops did, calling a synod at Arles to protest the elevation of a new bishop while the old bishop still lived. Archbishop Leidrad died in 816, and the controversy fizzled out, leaving Agobard as the new archbishop. Soon after taking office, he confronted several issues, which included opposing trials by ordeal,[2] and, in 818, writing against Felix of Urgel’s Spanish Adoptionist Christology.[3]

Anti-Jewish Polemic    
Agobard is notorious for his vocal attacks on the local Jewish population. Jewish communities in the Frankish realm (today's France) had been granted considerable freedoms under Louis the Pious son of Charlemagne, including a prohibition on Christian proselytizing. Louis appointed a magister Iudaeorum to ensure Jewish legal protection, and did not force Jews to allow baptism for their slaves. Agobard found this last provision particularly galling, and wrote his first anti-Jewish tract on the matter:
De Baptismo Judaicorum Mancipiorum (c. 823).[4] For the rest of the decade, Agobard campaigned against what he saw as the dangerous growth in power and influence of Jews in the kingdom that was contrary to canon law.[5] It was during this time that he wrote such works as Contra Praeceptum Impium[6] (c. 826), De Insolentia Judeorum[7] (c. 827), De Judaicis Superstitionibus[8] (c. 827), and De Cavendo Convictu et Societate Judaica[9] (c. 827).[10] Agobard’s rhetoric, which included describing Jews as "filii diaboli" ("children of the devil") was indicative of the developing anti-Jewish strain of medieval Christian thought. As Jeremy Cohen has claimed, Agobard’s response was paradoxically both stereotypical and knowledgeable (he showed a great knowledge of contemporary Judaism, while maintaining and perpetuating stereotypes).[11]

Icons 
In the 820s, a controversy emerged over the iconoclastic policies of bishop Claudius of Turin.[12] This stance was opposed by Dungal of Bobbio at the request of Louis the Pious. Agobard, in his Book on Paintings and Images, came out in opposition to Dungal’s method of using secular knowledge to justify veneration of images.[13]

Political Problems
In the 820s, Agobard had already shown his willingness to challenge Louis the Pious on the subject of Jews and on secular holdings of church land.[14] Agobard continued to confront the emperor, particularly on the issues of royal succession and the matter of land ownership. Agobard accused the emperor of abandoning his 817 Ordinatio imperii decree, which promoted an all-encompassing unity of church and empire.[15] In both of the two rebellions against Louis, 830 and 833, Agobard supported the ill-fated revolt of Louis’ son Lothair I. In 833, when Lothair launched his second revolt, Agobard published his support for Lothair once more in several works: A Comparison of Ecclesiastical and Political Government and Wherein the Dignity of the Church Outshines the Majesty of Empires and the Liber Apologeticus in defense of the rebelling sons of Louis.[16]

Exile and Return
After Louis was restored to his power, backed by his sons Louis the German and Pepin I of Aquitaine, Agobard was suspended from his episcopate by the Council of Thionville and exiled, replaced by the chorbishop Amalarius of Metz (c. 775 – c. 850).[17] During his tenure in Lyon, Amalarius worked to impose liturgical reforms upon the archdiocese of Lyon. Amalarius’ reforms were characterized by a heavy reliance upon allegorical and symbolic representations within the Mass. Agobard, on the other hand, disdained Amalarius’ reforms as “theatrical” and “showy” and favored a more plain liturgy.[18] Amalarius’ reforms were also opposed by Agobard’s disciple Florus of Lyon; Amalarius was deposed and accused of heresy in 838.[19] Agobard wrote three works against Amalarius: On Divine Psalmody, On the Correction of the Antiphonary, and Liber officialis. When he returned to Lyon, Agobard worked to roll back Amalarius’ actions, with the support of Florus.[20]

Other works
During his life, Agobard wrote more works on other issues, including several against pagan practices,[21] two on the role of clergy,[22] and a treatise on icons.[23]

Agobard also wrote a treatise arguing against weather magic called De Grandine et Tonitruis ("On Hail and Thunder"). A passage in it mentions the popular belief in ships in the clouds whose sailors were thought to take crops damaged by hail or storms to their land of Magonia.

Many of his works were lost until 1605, when a manuscript was discovered in Lyons and published by Papirius Masson, and again by Baluze in 1666.[24] Agobard's complete works can be found in Volume 104 of J.P. Migne's Patrologia Latina, and, in a more recent edition, in Van Acker's Agobardi Lugdunensis Opera Omnia.[25]

 

Louis the Pious ex Wiki          
Louis the Pious
(778 – 20 June 840), also called the Fair, and the Debonaire,[1] was the King of the Franks and co-Emperor (as Louis I) with his father, Charlemagne, from 813. He was also King of Aquitaine from 781.

As the only surviving adult son of Charlemagne and Hildegard, he became the sole ruler of the Franks after his father's death in 814, a position which he held until his death, save for the period 833–34, during which he was deposed.

During his reign in Aquitaine, Louis was charged with the defence of the empire's southwestern frontier. He conquered Barcelona from the Muslims in 801 and asserted Frankish authority over Pamplona and the Basques south of the Pyrenees in 812. As emperor he included his adult sons, Lothair, Pepin, and Louis, in the government and sought to establish a suitable division of the realm among them. The first decade of his reign was characterised by several tragedies and embarrassments, notably the brutal treatment of his nephew Bernard of Italy, for which Louis atoned in a public act of self-debasement.

In the 830s his empire was torn by civil war between his sons, only exacerbated by Louis's attempts to include his son Charles by his second wife in the succession plans. Though his reign ended on a high note, with order largely restored to his empire, it was followed by three years of civil war. Louis is generally compared unfavourably to his father, though the problems he faced were of a distinctly different sort.