Perverting the course of justice
QUOTE
Perverting the course of justice,
in English,
Canadian
(see article 139 of Canadian Criminal Code), and
Irish law, is
a criminal offence in which someone prevents
justice
from being served on himself or on another party. It is a
common-law offence carrying a maximum sentence of
life imprisonment.
Perverting the course of justice can be
any of three acts:
-
Fabricating or disposing of evidence
-
Intimidating or threatening a
witness
or
juror
-
Intimidating or threatening a
judge
Also criminal are (1) conspiring with
another to pervert the course of justice and (2) intending to pervert the
course of justice........
UNQUOTE
This is for outsiders chancing
their arms rather than insiders.
Misfeasance In Public Office ex Wiki
QUOTE
Misfeasance, nonfeasance, and malfeasance are types
of failure to discharge public
obligations existing by
common
law,
custom, or
statute.
Definition and relevant rules of law
When a contract creates a duty that does not exist at common law, there are
three things the parties can do wrong:
- Nonfeasance is the failure to act where action is
required—willfully or in neglect.
- Misfeasance is the willful inappropriate action or
intentional incorrect action or advice.
- Malfeasance is the willful and intentional action that
injures a party.
Example: A company hires a catering company to provide drinks and
food for a retirement party. If the catering company doesn't show up, it is
considered nonfeasance. If the catering company shows up but only
provides drinks (and not the food, which was also paid for), it is
considered misfeasance. If the catering company accepts a bribe from
its client's competitor to undercook the meat, thereby giving those present
food poisoning, it is considered malfeasance.
The rule of law laid down is that an action in contract (ex
contractu) will lie for any of the three. However, an action in tort
(ex
delicto), will lie only in misfeasance or malfeasance. The doctrine
was formerly applied to certain callings carried on publicly.[1]
At present the terms misfeasance and nonfeasance are most often used with
reference to the conduct of municipal authorities with reference to the
discharge of their statutory obligations; and it is an established rule that
an action lies in favour of persons injured by misfeasance, i.e. by
negligence in discharge of the duty; but that in the case of nonfeasance
the remedy is not by action but by indictment or
mandamus
or by the particular procedure prescribed by the statutes.
This rule is fully established in the case of failure to repair public
highways; but in other cases the courts are astute [ sic ] to find evidence of
carelessness in the discharge of public duties and on that basis to award
damages to individuals who have suffered thereby.
Misfeasance is also used with reference to the conduct of directors and
officers of joint-stock companies. The word malfeasance is sometimes used as
equivalent to
malpractice by a medical practitioner.
See also
UNQUOTE
Does the Crown Prosecution Service
do this sort of thing?
Jews Systematically Pervert The Course Of Justice
A victim of The Very Reverend Rabbi
Todros Grynhaus explains all.
Corrupt or other improper exercise of police powers and privileges ex
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015
(1)A police constable listed in subsection (3) commits an offence if he or
she—
(a)exercises the powers and privileges of a constable
improperly, and
(b)knows or ought to know that the exercise is
improper.
(2)A police constable guilty of an offence under this
section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term
not exceeding 14 years or a fine (or both)......................
(8)An offence is committed under this section if the act or omission in
question takes place in the United Kingdom or in United Kingdom waters [
but not the High Seas? ]....
(11)Nothing in this section affects what constitutes the offence of
Misconduct In Public Office at
common law in England and Wales or Northern Ireland.
