CPS Prosecution
Principles
Their website tells us that the decision to prosecute
is based on:-
- Having enough evidence to get a result &
- Prosecution being in the public interest.
There may be some simple minded enough to believe them. The
wonderful people who made a television programme called
Undercover Mosque are not among
their number.
After being called liars
Hardcash Productions had to sue the police and
Crown Prosecution Service for Libel. When the
matter got to court the perpetrators admitted that they were lying in their
teeth. By extension it follows that the CPS and police conspired to
Pervert The Course Of Justice
for the benefit of
Third World enemy aliens. It may be that what they
did was
Treason. It is certainly
Misconduct In Public Office. The police complaint to
Ofcom was
rejected. The police lied.
Ofcom didn't
swallow their allegations.
CPS Instructions For Prosecuting Advocates
Cover action regarding
crooked police who are giving evidence.
Adverse Judicial Findings
oblige prosecutors to tell the truth about bent coppers and bent prosecutions.
There are also
Attorney General's Guidelines on Disclosure.
CPS Defines Offences
Rather a useful reference.
Police, Law And You
The police are your enemy. It is a simple point and important to understand.
Procedural safeguards against them have been weakened by that corrupt little
swine, Blair. Robert Henderson's guide to what you should say is important.
There is a lot not to say as well.
Police
Pervert The Course Of Justice
QUOTE
In January, I
wrote about a documentary which was screened in Britain on January 15.
This show, entitled "Undercover Mosque", was screened by Channel 4 on its
"Dispatches" strand, and was produced by
Hardcash Productions. The one-hour documentary showed the results of a
undercover journalist's secret videotaping over four months at the Green
Lane Mosque in Birmingham, in the West Midlands. The documentary can be
found on
Hot Air, or on
YouTube,
with a transcript
here. A downloadable QuickTime file (106 mb) can be found
here..........
There is nothing in the documentary which differs from other serious
documentaries - extracts from DVDs on sale at various mosques are shown, and
preachers are shown making hate filled and extremist statements, without
dubbing or narration. Despite the authenticity of the documentary showing
preachers at Green Lane and other mosques exhorting Muslims to hate
non-Muslims,....... West Midlands Police have taken the astonishing step of
trying to have Channel 4
PROSECUTED for showing the documentary. Initially, the police had
considered prosecuting three of the preachers featured in "Undercover
Mosque". They decided not to press charges against the preachers of hate,
but moved on to try to have the makers of the documentary charged.
UNQUOTE
Perhaps a better charge would be
Malicious Prosecution -
against the police and CPS. Fortunately Channel 4 had enough money to do
them for Libel so the filth bottled out. Justice is a luxury that rich men can
afford. The rest of us get screwed.
Police Try It On
QUOTE
Channel 4's controversial documentary
Undercover Mosque was great investigative journalism. That the CPS
thought it incited racial hatred beggars belief.
UNQUOTE
You might think he means that the police must have been
lying. Putting it that way makes it harder for them to claim that they were
libelled.
Police Lie About Their Involvement
QUOTE
Police account differs from that of Ofcom
Now the Eye gives a bit more context to the police complaint:
Had
[Assistant Chief Constable Anil]
Patani bothered to
check the CPS website beforehand he’d have realised that,
under the legislation governing Ofcom, complaints about
unfairness can only come from “the person affected”…the
“formal complaint” looks like a non-starter. It appears to
be little more than a publicity stunt.
Further:
The Eye
asked the West Midlands police why they hadn’t read the
rules before lodging the complaint. A spokeswoman told us
that they had “liaised” with Ofcom in advance…But this true?
“No,” said an Ofcom
spokeswoman… “We certainly didn’t.”
The police also told
the Eye that the formal complaint to Ofcom came jointly from
themselves and the CPS. Again, this turns out to be untrue.
But the confusion is understandable, since Bethan David of
the CPS certainly aided and abetted the stunt.
The report ends by noting that the documentary-makers are
considering suing for libel. I drew attention to this
possibility a few days ago; in 2002 journalist Donal MacIntyre
won a libel action against Kent Police in similar
circumstances. He received £15,000 damages and reportedly
£650,000 in costs.
UNQUOTE
Police lied? Police don't do much else.
Social Cohesion Centre
Good on the general case against Islamic
trouble makers.
The Full Story
QUOTE
The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police was personally responsible for
the disastrous decision to complain about Channel 4's Undercover Mosque
documentary exposing extremism in a Birmingham mosque, an inquiry has been
told. Paul Scott-Lee, head of the region’s force, approved the decision in a
conversation with another senior officer, the Home Affairs Select Committee
heard. But nobody has been disciplined for the humiliating incident, which
led to the force being sued for libel in the High Court and forced to offer
a grovelling apology.
UNQUOTE
A good police force catches more criminals than it employs. Of
course when criminals run the force that ain't going to happen.
Undercover Mosque -
Wiki
QUOTE
However Bethan David of the CPS
agreed with West Midlands Police Assistant Chief Constable Anil Patani
(security and cohesion) that a damaging and distorting impression had been
given of the speakers by the programme.
UNQUOTE
There seems little
enough doubt about their story. Presumably they thought they could get away
with it. Fortunately C4 had the money and good sense to tell them to fuck
off.
How To Lose The War On Islamist
Terror
QUOTE
ACC Anil Patani for
West Midlands Police said: "As a result of our ... "The
CPS has demonstrated
that it will not hesitate to prosecute ..."
UNQUOTE
He lied. This article is a decent summary of the whole thing.
UK Commentators: Compare And Contrast
"8 Aug 2007 ... The
CPS was also asked by
the police to consider whether a ... "ANIL
PATANI, an Asian police officer in the Nottinghamshire force, ..."
ukcommentators.blogspot.com/2007/08/compare-and-contrast.html
3.
CPS complains to Ofcom over 'distorted' Channel 4 film on mosque
...
"The police and
CPS suggest that
comments like these were taken 'out of context'. ...
Anil Patani, also
appears to have followed this line of thinking. ..."
www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=191x22146
5.
Counter terrorism- West Midlands
style. | tee2i.org
"Assistant Chief
Constable (Security and Cohesion)
Anil Patani was the
chief ... WMP cannot be solely blamed as the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
gave them ..."
tee2i.org/articles/231
6.
The Police
vs. Channel 4 | Adrian Monck
"[Assistant Chief
Constable] Anil Patani
for West Midlands Police said: “As a ...
CPS [Crown Prosecution
Service] reviewing lawyer Bethan David considered 56 ..."
adrianmonck.com/2007/11/the-police-vs-channel-4/
7.
Private Eye: Police Complaint over Documentary “a Stunt ...
"Had [Assistant
Chief Constable Anil] Patani bothered to check the
CPS website beforehand
he’d have realised that, under the legislation governing Ofcom, ..."
barthsnotes.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/private-eye-police-complaint-over-documentary-a-stunt/
10.
ANNUAL REPORT 2004/5
"Chair -
Anil Patani,Assistant
Chief Constable,West Midlands Police. • David Blundell, Chief Crown
Prosecutor - CPS West
Midlands ..."
lcjb.cjsonline.gov.uk/download.asp?dl=21037-report2.pdf&area=40
11.
House Price Crash forum > West Mids Police, Cps Sued Over Muslim Film
"15 May 2008 ...
The West Mids Police and
CPS accused C4 of grossly distorting the ...... ANIL PATANI, an Asian
police officer in the Nottinghamshire force ..."
www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t77057.html
12.
The
Stirrer
"Rolle’s letter to
the IPCC cited Assistant Chief Constable
Anil Patani, ... and
they point out that prosecutions are determined by the
CPS. ..."
www.thestirrer.co.uk/ipcc-reject-complaint-2806081.html
13.
Western
Resistance: UK: How To Lose The War On Islamist Terror
"21 Aug 2007 ...
ACC Anil Patani for
West Midlands Police said: "As a result of our ... "The
CPS has demonstrated
that it will not hesitate to prosecute ..."
www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003837.html
14.
Channel 4 mosque programme 'distorted' - Telegraph
"The complaint was
made after the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
concluded there ... Assistant Chief Constable
Anil Patani said: "As a
result of our initial ..."
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1559753/Channel-4-mosque-programme-distorted.html
15.
Family Security
Matters Archive
"ACC
Anil Patani for West
Midlands Police said: "As a result of our initial ...
CPS reviewing lawyer
Bethan David considered 56 hours of media footage of ..."
www.fsmarchives.org/article.php?id=1260062
16.
2007 August |
mediawatchwatch.org.uk
"Some more backlash
about the West Midland Police and
CPS extraordinary
decision to widen their remit to ... ACC
Anil Patani for West
Midlands Police said: ..."
www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/08/page/2/
17.
Blinkx Video: Channel 4 mosque programme 'distorted'
"The
CPS also found there
was not enough evidence to support charges against ... Assistant Chief
Constable Anil Patani
said: "As a result of our initial ..."
www.blinkx.com/video/channel-4-mosque-programme-distorted/P8QGQDa0pMK2gqfLeMqPDQ
18.
Not guilty – but
who's to know?, Kevin Sutcliffe - British ...
"... the letter was
from Assistant Chief Constable
Anil Patani, the ACC in
charge ... Patani’s letter went on to say the
CPS did not think there
was enough ..."
www.bjr.org.uk/data/2008/no1_sutcliffe
19.
ConservativeHome's ToryDiary: Is Britain policing or appeasing ...
"Case in point:
West Midlands Police trying to convince the
CPS that Channel 4 ....
West Midlands Assistant Chief Constable
Anil Patani are NOT
appeasers. ..."
conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/2007/08/is-britain-poli.html
20.
Untitled
"Welcome to the
annual report for CPS
Essex for 2004- .... Left to right: Anil Patani, Ian Allen, John Bell,
Yvonne Ferns, Baroness ..."
www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/areas/2005/ar2005essex.pdf
UKIP Man Prosecuted For Annoying Islamics [
1 February 2015 ]
QUOTE
'I don't believe that Mr. Couch
appreciated the seriousness of these [ Racism
]
offences at the time but he is now
aware.'
UNQUOTE
But the magistrates didn't put him in prison so perhaps they have
some residual sense of decency. It was
Selective Prosecution. Englishmen
get screwed while foreigners walk away laughing - see e.g. the next one.
Racist Islamic Preachers Incite Murder
[ 1 February 2015 ]
The Crown Prosecution Service
refuse to prosecute Islamics for
inciting murder & race hatred. The
Crown Prosecution Service
alleged that there was not enough evidence. The
West Midlands Police offered to prosecute the people who exposed blatant
Racism, the programme makers instead of
the guilty. When the CPS and police were sued for Libel they admitted that
they had lied in their teeth. They still did not prosecute the Islamic
criminals.
This amounted to a
Conspiracy
to Pervert The Course Of
Justice. Englishmen get prosecuted while our wonderful government panders to
Third World criminals.
Crown Prosecution Service Concealed Truth About Janner In Order To Pervert
The Course Of Justice [ 19 April 2015 ]
QUOTE
Lord Macdonald says ‘serious
failing’ by prosecutors meant he was not told about case
UNQUOTE
The previous Director of
Public Prosecutions choses to allege that the
Crown Prosecution Service is
guilty of Misconduct In Public
Office. I chose to allege that I believe him.
Janner was allowed to get away with
Paedophile perversion because he is a Jew who
wormed his way into The Establishment,
exploiting the Holocaust® Racket.
Janner, The Jew Evidence Should Be Released Say His Victims [ 19 April 2015
]
The Guardian was privy to the cover up from the off. See
I Saw Up Close How An Establishment Closed Ranks Over The Janner Affair
Crown Prosecution Service Panders To Animal Rights Extremists
[ 25 February 2017 ]
QUOTE
We were very pleased that Ledbury huntsman Mark Melladay was cleared of
assault charges last week after he was prosecuted on the basis of malicious
allegations made by a well-known animal rights extremist (read the
Telegraph’s report).
Mark should not, however, have even been in court and this case, along
with the prosecution of Blackmore and Sparkford Vale huntsman Peter Dogrell
last year, has raised significant concerns about the implementation of the
‘Victim’s Right to Review’ which was introduced in 2013.
The right to review makes it easier for victims of crime to challenge
prosecutors’ decisions not to bring charges where allegations have been
made. In principle this is a perfectly reasonable approach and one which we
would support, but in practice it seems clear that prosecutors are being
influenced by organised campaigns, rather than just by the evidential and
public interest tests on which prosecuting decisions should be made...........
In both cases charging decisions seem to have been made on the basis of
who can shout the loudest, not the quality of the evidence provided by the
complainant. It is no surprise either that in both cases the target of the
allegations and subsequent campaigns were huntsmen, and that their accusers
were animal rights protestors.
UNQUOTE
The Left Wing has its crazies, often vicious
with a standard set of views driven by hate. Rent A
Mob is an ugly reality, just like criminals rioting because
Donald Trump won in spite of some three
million fraudulent votes. They push Feminism,
Homosexuality, anti-English
Racism and other evils.
Alison Levitt QC
One of theirs, was at it with a deeply unpleasant
Jew, Alex Carlile, she was exposed by
the News Of The World. He even went
and married her and she is now, in
April 2017 with Mishcon de Reya - see
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alison-levitt-qc-67308798/
- Alison
Levitt QC; hired on the grounds that she knows people, one assumes. It is
a standard technique for infiltrating the
Establishment
Crown Prosecution Service Criticised After Malicious Prosecution Is Rejected
By A Jury [ 16 April
2017 ]
QUOTE
The Crown Prosecution Service was facing
serious questions from MPs last night after a judge condemned it for
putting an innocent teacher on trial for raping a pupil following
‘enormous pressure’ from a former Metropolitan Police chief and an
ex-CPS boss. A jury took just 15 minutes to clear
high-flying deputy headmaster Kato Harris – who says the ordeal has
destroyed his life.
Now, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that
Sue Akers, an ex-Scotland Yard deputy assistant commissioner, hired as a
private detective by the 14-year-old’s wealthy family, influenced the
CPS decision to prosecute by pressurising officers from her old force..................
A damning official verdict, written by the trial judge and seen by this
newspaper, also suggests
Alison
Levitt QC,
the CPS’s former principal legal adviser to the
Director of Public
Prosecutions might have misled detectives into believing she acted as a
‘minister of justice’ for the CPS. At the time, she too was being paid
by the girl’s parents.
Akers and Levitt were hired by the pupil’s
family through exclusive legal firm
Mishcon de Reya...........
The judge said he was ‘at a loss’ to see
how the CPS decided there was ‘sufficient evidence to provide a
realistic prospect of conviction’...........
In an interview with The Mail on Sunday,
Mr Harris reveals that the girl’s false claims have destroyed his career
– and extinguished his once irrepressible spirit that endeared him to
legions of children.
UNQUOTE
Was the girl raped? Pass. Was she put up to it after telling a few lies?
Pass. Did the family want vengeance? Yes! Did the family use
Mishcon de Reya because they are Jews or because they have infiltrated
the Establishment, because they know how
to pervert the system?
PS The DPP,
Alison
Saunders is "controversial", a Feminist
who hates men.
Malicious Prosecution Fails After Householder Killed Islamic Thief
[ 20 December 2017 ]
QUOTE
A homeowner, who killed a drunk burglar by stabbing him 50 times after he
caught him trying to steal his TV, has been cleared of murder. Errol Hanson,
51, from Catford in south-east
London, knifed Mohammed Savare in early hours of the morning on June
19. Mr Savare, 26, bled to death within minutes, after receiving 30 stab
wounds to the neck alone. He had staggered through Hanson's open front door,
after a night drinking. Hanson was outside his home on Brownhill Road when
Mr Savare slipped in unnoticed.
UNQUOTE
The Crown Prosecution
Service are a nasty lot. Harassment is the name of the game. Brownhill
Road translates into black.
CPS Boss Set Up Malicious Rape Prosecution [ 7 January 2018 ]
The Crown Prosecution Service
was set up to protect people from police prosecution. Now it has been
infiltrated by Feminist ratbags full of hate,
where Englishmen are involved but they ignore
wholesale Rape by
Pakistani Perverts in Rotherham. Their
daughters don't matter; they didn't go to Roedean.
Rape Allegation Fails [ 12 January 2018 ]
Both drunk. No witnesses. No case to answer. Simple enough but the
Crown Prosecution Service leaned
on him anyway. It is one of a string of bad cases.
Crown Prosecution Service Drops Another Bad Rape Case
[ 19 January 2018 ]
The Main Stream Media are feeding us a string of
these stories. A lad was under threat for two years while paper sat in
someone's in-tray.
QUOTE
It comes as Britain's top prosecutor claimed no innocent people are in
jail as a result of failures to disclose crucial evidence. Alison Saunders,
head of the Crown Prosecution Service, insisted the justice system was
working properly, despite a string of rape trials collapsing.
But critics condemned her as 'complacent'
after it emerged that police and prosecutors have failed to hand over texts
and photos to defence lawyers in trials. The CPS has denied any failings.
UNQUOTE
We are supposed to have forgotten that the
Crown Prosecution Service
committed Perjury in order to
Pervert The Course Of Justice
to protect Islamic criminals. See
Undercover Mosque for more.
Every Rape Case In England To Be Reviewed
[ 28 January 2018 ]
QUOTE
The
Attorney General
has slammed police and prosecutors for their 'basic' errors in a number of
recent collapsed rape trials, after the CPS announced a review of every case.
Jeremy Wright
QC blamed underfunded services for a lack of resources, suggesting they
are a 'factor' in recent trials where defendants had charges against them
dropped when critical evidence emerged at the 11th hour. But, crucially,
those cases were primarily the result of police and prosecutor failures he
said, in a damning indictment of criminal justice system
competence............
The cases have rocked confidence in the
criminal justice system and Mr Wright said there was a 'substantial problem'
with how the disclosure regime was being followed.
UNQUOTE
For my money it is childless Feminist ratbags
full of hate.
Alison Saunders is where the buck stops albeit she seems to have
children. Police Corruption is like
police incompetence, always with us. Politicians told them to let
Pakistani Perverts rape
English girls as 1,400 of them know to their cost.
That is just in Rotherham.
The
CPS Instructions To Prosecuting Advocates covers action regarding
crooked police who are giving evidence.
Adverse Judicial Findings
obliges prosecutors to tell the truth about bent coppers and bent prosecutions.
They get ignored.
PS
Men must prove a woman said 'Yes' under tough new rape rules said
Saunders and justice be damned. That was back January 2015. How many men
did she succeed in putting away?
CPS Boss & Feminist Released Into The Community
[ 2 April 2018 ]
A Director of Public
Prosecutions mounts Malicious
Prosecutions of men & suppresses evidence of innocence, she has
Perverted The Course Of
Justice. She was paid £250,000 a year, enough to justify honest work. We
didn't get it.
Crown Prosecution Service Stitched Up Homosexual DJ
[ 4 November 2018 ]
QUOTE
Five years ago this week, veteran
BBC radio presenter Paul Gambaccini was woken in his luxury
London apartment by a team of eight officers from the Metropolitan Police.
It was 4.38am. They arrested him on accusations of sexually abusing two
underage boys in the late 1970s and early 1980s and confiscated sacks of his
possessions, including computers, cameras, phones, Paul’s UK and U.S.
passports and 38 years of diaries.............
But Paul’s life was turned inside-out. Work dried up, his income stopped,
friends melted away and his anger levels rocketed.
And then, a year later, the CPS dropped the case on the basis of
‘insufficient evidence’ and, just in case anyone had forgotten, reiterated
not only the alleged crime, but the incorrect ages of the ‘victims’. ‘It
feels as if the Metropolitan Police has become like a third-rate Stasi,’
says Paul.
We are chatting because, this week, he was awarded substantial damages,
plus costs and an unreserved apology from the CPS over the misleading
statement it put out after he was cleared.
‘Those weasel words, “insufficient evidence”,’
says Paul today, banging a bottle of water on the table in barely controlled
fury. ‘There was no evidence.’
UNQUOTE
The Crown Prosecution Service
leaves corrupt politicians alone. It treats the
Rotherham cover up with an air of sincere indifference. The police of
course are happy to ignore crime when they are told to or pursue it where
there is nothing.
Major Fraud Case Collapses After CPS Star Witness Is Found To Be A Fantasist
QUOTE
Between May 2011 and February 2015, more than 70 victims -
mainly vulnerable pensioners - were conned into investing into
one of five companies which invested in the diamond and carbon
credit industries. In total, they lost £3.5million and today at Southwark Crown
Court eight defendants walked free from court after a judge was
forced to deliver not guilty verdicts on multiple
fraud charges.
The case collapsed following “chaotic” disclosure failures
and after the
Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) key witness, Andrew Ager
was discredited as “wholly misleading”. Police officers have also confirmed that an allegation into
his conduct has been referred to the
National Crime Agency, while defence lawyers told The
Telegraph that “the safety of the convictions in every previous
carbon credits prosecution is now in question”...........
Reporting
restrictions were lifted yesterday half-way through the
two-month trial after Mr Ager, the CPS’s expert witness on the
carbon credit trading market, admitted that he had no academic
qualifications, had received no training nor had he attended any
course on the carbon credit trade.............
He described the disclosure in the case as “pretty chaotic
and unsatisfactory”, combined with other “insuperable problems”
meaning that the prosecution was “fatally flawed”. The judge also criticised the City of London police which
investigated the alleged scam, and described one police officer
who had been “rather too proactive” in preparing the Ager’s
witness statement................
The case comes in the wake of prosecution disclosure failures
that lead to the collapse of several high-profile sex cases.
However Narita Bahra QC, who represented Mr Sulley, said outside
court: "There is a public perception that disclosure failures are
limited to cases involving sexual offences. But the reality is
that they are not. “The onus shouldn’t be put on a good defence team to alert
the prosecution to the failures in their case.”
UNQUOTE
Carbon Emission Trading is a monstrous
fraud costing the world, especially Western
Civilization trillions, not mere billions but that is another issue, one
driven by the Puppet Masters who manipulate the
Useful Idiots in the
Global Warming racket. Perhaps the real point
to take is that Evidence, in particular
Expert Evidence should be regarded with a
sceptical eye.
City Police should be on the ball regarding financial fraud. The
Crown Prosecution Service is a bunch
of third rate incompetents too.
Corrupt Prosecutors Use Selective Prosecution To Protect Hard Left Criminals
And Malicious Prosecution Against The Innocent
[ 17 August 2019 ]
QUOTE
July 19 was a grim day for three young men
from the Rise Above Movement (RAM) who were told their punishment by a
federal district judge in Charlottesville, Va. The defendants had been
arrested under the Anti-Riot Act, which a California federal court has found
unconstitutional, and charged for their participation in the 2018 “riots” in
Charlottesville and California.
Denied bail, the RAM defendants, after
many months in difficult conditions in prison, had entered into plea
agreements in May 2019............
The hearing, however, had an air of
Kafkaesque, bizarre unreality. During the entire hearing the government and
its FBI witnesses ignored or mitigated the provocative, aggressive, and
often violent actions of the counterprotestors, which included Antifa and
other hard-left radicals, at the Charlottesville and California
confrontations............
Unfortunately, the First Amendment rights
of non-leftist protesters are of no real concern to activist judges today,
most of whom are too scared to buck the narrative that white people who do
not support neo-Bolshevism and anarchism are all dangerous terrorists.
UNQUOTE
The government officials doing this are part of the
Deep State. Recall that the
FBI perpetrated the Waco Massacre,
investigated itself and went clear. Only their victims were prosecuted.
Crown Prosecution Service Mounted Malicious Prosecutions Against Small Right
Wing Organisation
[ 21 August 2019 ]
QUOTE
Several weeks ago, Andrew Clarke, a former member of Britain’s
National Action, ,
walked free with no criminal convictions after 18 months in prison. During
that period of time, Andrew, along with some of his former colleagues, was
subjected to two trials at the direction of the Crown Prosecution Service,
neither of which convinced a jury that Clarke was guilty of the charge
levelled at him – that he remained a member of National Action after the
banning of the organization under terrorism legislation in December 2016.
UNQUOTE
Andrew Clarke got 18 months in prison and two trials but the
Crown Prosecution Service failed
to convict him. Thank God for Juries; they are
prone to get it right when the Establishment
is driven by hate. Our masters are willing to use
Malicious Prosecution against honest
Englishmen and allow vicious
Third World parasites to incite murder; that
is
and
Selective Prosecution.
They are anti-English Racists - aliens and our
politicians both. We are victims of a government of
Traitors.
Do not forget that a
Corrupt Government Harasses Men Of The Parachute Regiment While IRA Murderers
Walk Free. They also harassed
poor little
Emma West, claiming that they put her in prison
to protect her from anti-White Racists. National Action
is at the receiving end of a very hostile
Wikipedia
article.
PS Mr Clarke made a serious mistake, he talked to the police and allowed himself
to be questioned in court. If you pass that way say nothing but first read about
Resistance to Interrogation. See
what Professor Duane tells law students -
Top Flight Law Professor
Says NEVER Talk To The Police.
Police, Politicians And Prosecutors Protected Paedophile Perverts
[ 26 February 2020 ]
QUOTE
Political parties, police and prosecutors “turned a blind eye” to
allegations of child sexual abuse connected to Westminster, ignored victims
and showed excessive “deference” to MPs and ministers fighting to clear
their reputations, an investigation has found.
The long-awaited report by the independent inquiry into child sexual
abuse into the most politically sensitive section of its work, however,
dismisses claims of any conspiracy involving an “organised Westminster
paedophile network”.
The 173-page review, following hearings over the past two years, names
several prominent MPs, including the Liberal MP Sir
Cyril Smith and the
Conservative Sir Peter Morrison, as being “known to be active in their
sexual interest in children” but who escaped prosecution..................
“Nevertheless, it is clear that there have been significant failures by
Westminster institutions in their responses to allegations of child sexual
abuse. This included failure to recognise it, turning a blind eye to it,
actively shielding and protecting child sexual abusers and covering up
allegations.”..........
“At that time, nobody seemed to care about the fate of the children
involved, with status and political concerns overriding all else..............
The then commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Sir
Joe Simpson, is
reported to have said at a Home Office meeting that there were “several
cottages in Westminster which we don’t investigate” because “they are
frequented by celebrities and MPs”. The report adds: “It is an example of a
policy giving special treatment to persons of prominence and of deference
towards those in power at Westminster.”.............
The report also highlights the case of Sir
Peter Hayman, a senior
diplomat in the 1960s and 70s who was a leading member of the PIE. “There
were longstanding public concerns about whether the decision not to
prosecute, either for his involvement in PIE or for sending obscene material
through the post, might have been politically motivated,” the report says............. “It is difficult to come to any other conclusion than Hayman was treated
differently from his co‐defendants on the basis of who he was. In other
words, his prominent position gave rise to special pleading for which he
received special treatment.” [ The legal term is
Selective Prosecution,
a standard form of political corruption - Editor ]
UNQUOTE
Is the Establishment in England any less
corrupt than that in Italy or America? There did not need to be
an organised ‘Westminster paedophile network’. They knew the score. The
vulgar American term is
Cover your ass.
The English one is
don't let the side down.
So now the 2014 Child
Sexual Abuse Inquiry, in 2020 is producing results of a sort. Believe
it? Trust it? Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.
The ugly reality if that nobody in Westminster cared about the daughters of
little people, of the peasant masses. That goes double for the thousands of
English girls raped and abused by Pakistani
Perverts in
Rotherham, Rochdale
et cetera ad nauseam. Another cover up in the very expensive making? The report is at
Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster
Errors & omissions, broken links, cock
ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I
am open to comment.
Email me at Mike Emery. All financial
contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my
PGP
Key.
Home Page