The Resistible Rise Of Marine Le Pen [ March 2015 ]
The Economist whines about Madame le Pen being a patriot, exposing its
blatant anti-French Racism. Are they some of
Lenin's Useful Idiots or
Traitors?
Marine Is The Front Runner For President
Decrypting the French is possible but the graph is clear enough. She has
what it takes.
http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/le-monde-interview-with-marine-le-pen.html
What's your reaction to the "Charlie Hebdo" affair?
There is a trial of strength between the different groups of political and
religious fundamentalists in France. These trials of strength have been lost,
notably by the Sarkozyist right. And each time that they have negotiated, fallen
back, twisted, the ground has been prepared for the events which are shaking the
world today. No negotiations are possible.
Either we say that freedom of expression with the reservations imposed by the
law, or we put in place censorship of the internet, we submit the newspapers for
preliminary reading by the government, we re-establish the crime of blasphemy.
Are you for a right to blaspheme?
I'm glad the crime of blasphemy no longer exists. What I find astonishing is the
variable geometry of the political class. We are in a country where 95% of the
desecrations concern Catholic places of worship or graves and not a single line
appears, not one statement from a minister. And as soon as there is a
desecration of a mosque or square, immediately, a press statement has to be
issued.
If you were in power, what would you do?
I'd throw out all the foreign fundamentalists. We know them very well. The Law
of 1905 [Law of secularism separating church and state] has to be applied
strictly: no more mosque financing, directly or indirectly. No more foreign
financing. Except in a specific case of a reciprocity agreement. I am happy that
a foreign state finances a mosque in our country if it does not prohibit the
financing of churches or any other religion on its own territory.
How would the mosques be financed?
With the money of the faithful. As applies to all other religions. The law
doesn't recognise any religion. No more prayers in the streets, no more dietary
requirements in the public schools.
Kosher as well as halal?
The same. I will have it written in the Constitution that "the Republic does not
recognise any community". Which would allow us to oppose all the communitarian
claims, including those from the private sector.
Are you still for banning the veil in public spaces? In the street?
Yes, the shops, transport, the street...
Evil? NO!
It's a measure that kills freedom...
That depends on what you consider freedom. You're prohibited from walking naked
in the street...Is that freedom-killing?
How would you define that a veil is religious or not? That poses a problem of
application of the law...
It's banned. The veil is banned. That's clear! We are capable of making the
distinction between a religious veil and one that isn't.
This ban would apply to all ostentatious signs?
What do you call ostentatious signs?
The kippa for example...
It's clear that if we ban the veil, we ban the kippa in public spaces.
Should we conduct a specific action in the banlieues?
When you've sent the fundamentalist foreign imams back to their countries -
because the vast majority are foreigners - when you've stopped financing Islam
left, right and centre, and by definition fundamentalist Islam, the civil
populations of the "quartiers" need to be protected from the pressure of the
fundamentalists, including the Muslims populations who are victims of it. For
that, we need order to return to the law, for the Republic to resume its grip on
a certain number of "quartiers".
How does the Republic resume its grip?
First through the school, to which we will give its role. Primary school
shouldn't be giving course in foreign languages and culture. The role of the
secular school, public and Republican, is to manufacture French people. Not to
send children back to their origins. To prevent religion becoming an identity, a
substitute nationality, we need to give substantive content to French
nationality. This is the national priority. on
You are French, yellow, green, orange, brown, black; you are agnostic, atheist,
Muslim, Jewish.. because you are French, you have priority access to social
housing and employment. You are going to know why you are French. There are many
young people who define themselves first of all by their origins and not by
their nationality. So, stop double nationality.
What's your opinion of the consequences of the Arab revolutions?
The "Arab spring" has turned into the Islamist winter. It's very worrying for
Europe, because there is a risk it will result in a worsening of immigration. I
think of the interests of the people of these countries, many of whom are
starting to live in fear.
Libya is perhaps the most dramatic situation and the one where we have the
greatest responsibility. We consciously placed at the head of the Libyan state
fundamentalists who had been armed to Qatar. We have been irresponsible in
blindly following the United States.
There is a country, the United States, which never stops saying that it is in
a struggle against fundamentalism and which, every time it has intervened
somewhere, has delivered the country where it intervened to Islamist
fundamentalists.
As to the affair of the film Innocence of Muslims, it is eminently suspect. This
type of Z-level sub-series is put online as if by chance by a Salafist
television channel, and as if by chance, it provokes this attack in Benghazi, on
11 September. I don't believe in the chance element in this business.
